Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2

Arınç ÜNAL arinc.unal at arinc9.com
Sat Feb 4 04:12:42 PST 2023


On 4.02.2023 14:43, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> Gesendet: Samstag, 04. Februar 2023 um 11:27 Uhr
>> Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w at public-files.de>
>> An: "Arınç ÜNAL" <arinc.unal at arinc9.com>
>> Cc: arinc9.unal at gmail.com, "Rob Herring" <robh+dt at kernel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>, "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg at gmail.com>, devicetree at vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek at lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org, erkin.bozoglu at xeront.com, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang at mediatek.com>, "DENG Qingfang" <dqfext at gmail.com>
>> Betreff: Aw: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] arm: dts: mt7623: mux phy0 on Bananapi BPI-R2
>>
>> Hi aranc,
>>
>> have tested this series, basicly it works, but i get only ~620 Mbits/sec (much more i will need on wan) in tx-mode of r2, rx-mode (iperf3 -c IP -R on r2) gets full 939 Mbits/sec. Both no retransmitts.
>>
>> tried with my laptop which gets 940Mbit/sec in tx mode too...other end is a R2 with 5.15 connected to lan0 (and eth1+aux enabled, dmesg clean so far...for the "kernel log flooded"-comment).
>>
>> maybe gmac1 needs to be tweaked a bit (clock-settings)?
>>
>> can you confirm this with your board?
> 
> tested the vlan_aware way with 5.15.80 and got better result
> 
> ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> ip l set aux master br0
> ip l set wan master br0
> bridge vlan add vid 99 dev wan
> bridge vlan add vid 99 dev aux
> bridge vlan
> ip l s eth1 up
> ip l s wan up
> ip a a 192.168.0.11/24 dev eth1
> ip l s br0 up
> ip l s aux up
> 
> i see traffic on eth1 increasing and iperf3 shows in both directions ~940Mbit/s, no strange mesages in dmesg while testing...where do you see these?

You didn't put eth1 on a bridge. I suggest you read my mails with higher 
attention so both of our time is spent efficiently.

> 
> tested vlan-way with 6.2 and felix' Patches to more comparable with your test...and got same result (~625Mbit/s in tx and 940Mbit/s in rx-mode=-R on r2)...so it seems anything between 5.15 and 6.2 reduced gmac1 tx bandwidth.

I don't see an incentive to investigate unless the issue is confirmed on 
a daily netdev/net-next.git main tree.

> 
> to summarize:
> 
> i get same result with your patches and my old vlan_bridge way with same codebase...how do i see your problem with the vlan-bridge-way? Do you test with bpi-r2 or only any other board and change r2 to have same DT?

I tested this only on a Bananapi BPI-R2 using the devicetree with this 
series applied on a few days old netdev/net-next.git main tree.

Arınç



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list