[PATCH 6/6] clk: samsung: exynos5433: Extract PM support to common ARM64 layer

[kernel test robot]

Hi Sam,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on krzk/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.2-rc6]
[cannot apply to next-20230203]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sam-Protsenko/clk-samsung-Don-t-pass-reg_base-to-samsung_clk_register_pll/20230203-141059
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230203060924.8257-7-semen.protsenko%40linaro.org
patch subject: [PATCH 6/6] clk: samsung: exynos5433: Extract PM support to common ARM64 layer
config: openrisc-randconfig-r003-20230202 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230203/202302032018.WKygXXHK-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/7fc08f82f3096e6f1c747f00b9d56c029b0b7a0f
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Sam-Protsenko/clk-samsung-Don-t-pass-reg_base-to-samsung_clk_register_pll/20230203-141059
        git checkout 7fc08f82f3096e6f1c747f00b9d56c029b0b7a0f
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc olddefconfig
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=openrisc SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/clk/samsung/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c: In function 'exynos_arm64_cmu_prepare_pm':
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c:136:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'kfree'; did you mean 'vfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     136 |                 kfree(data->clk_save);
         |                 ^~~~~
         |                 vfree
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +136 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-arm64.c

   114	
   115	static int __init exynos_arm64_cmu_prepare_pm(struct device *dev,
   116			const struct samsung_cmu_info *cmu)
   117	{
   118		struct exynos_arm64_cmu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   119		int i;
   120	
   121		data->clk_save = samsung_clk_alloc_reg_dump(cmu->clk_regs,
   122							    cmu->nr_clk_regs);
   123		if (!data->clk_save)
   124			return -ENOMEM;
   125	
   126		data->nr_clk_save = cmu->nr_clk_regs;
   127		data->clk_suspend = cmu->suspend_regs;
   128		data->nr_clk_suspend = cmu->nr_suspend_regs;
   129		data->nr_pclks = of_clk_get_parent_count(dev->of_node);
   130		if (!data->nr_pclks)
   131			return 0;
   132	
   133		data->pclks = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(struct clk *), data->nr_pclks,
   134					   GFP_KERNEL);
   135		if (!data->pclks) {
 > 136			kfree(data->clk_save);
   137			return -ENOMEM;
   138		}
   139	
   140		for (i = 0; i < data->nr_pclks; i++) {
   141			struct clk *clk = of_clk_get(dev->of_node, i);
   142	
   143			if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
   144				kfree(data->clk_save);
   145				while (--i >= 0)
   146					clk_put(data->pclks[i]);
   147				return PTR_ERR(clk);
   148			}
   149			data->pclks[i] = clk;
   150		}
   151	
   152		return 0;
   153	}
   154	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests