[RFC PATCH v3 19/22] arm64: unwinder: Add a reliability check in the unwinder based on ORC
madvenka at linux.microsoft.com
madvenka at linux.microsoft.com
Wed Feb 1 23:40:33 PST 2023
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka at linux.microsoft.com>
Introduce a reliability flag in struct unwind_state. This will be set to
false if the PC does not have a valid ORC or if the frame pointer computed
from the ORC does not match the actual frame pointer.
Now that the unwinder can validate the frame pointer, introduce
arch_stack_walk_reliable().
Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka at linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h | 15 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 175 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
index 508f734de46e..064aaf5dc3a0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace/common.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/objtool.h>
struct stack_info {
unsigned long low;
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ struct stack_info {
* @fp: The fp value in the frame record (or the real fp)
* @pc: The lr value in the frame record (or the real lr)
*
+ * @prev_pc: The lr value in the previous frame record.
* @kr_cur: When KRETPROBES is selected, holds the kretprobe instance
* associated with the most recently encountered replacement lr
* value.
@@ -32,10 +34,15 @@ struct stack_info {
* @stack: The stack currently being unwound.
* @stacks: An array of stacks which can be unwound.
* @nr_stacks: The number of stacks in @stacks.
+ *
+ * @cfa: The sp value at the call site of the current function.
+ * @unwind_type The previous frame's unwind type.
+ * @reliable: Stack trace is reliable.
*/
struct unwind_state {
unsigned long fp;
unsigned long pc;
+ unsigned long prev_pc;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
struct llist_node *kr_cur;
#endif
@@ -44,6 +51,9 @@ struct unwind_state {
struct stack_info stack;
struct stack_info *stacks;
int nr_stacks;
+ unsigned long cfa;
+ int unwind_type;
+ bool reliable;
};
static inline struct stack_info stackinfo_get_unknown(void)
@@ -70,11 +80,15 @@ static inline void unwind_init_common(struct unwind_state *state,
struct task_struct *task)
{
state->task = task;
+ state->prev_pc = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_KRETPROBES
state->kr_cur = NULL;
#endif
state->stack = stackinfo_get_unknown();
+ state->reliable = true;
+ state->cfa = 0;
+ state->unwind_type = UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_CALL;
}
static struct stack_info *unwind_find_next_stack(const struct unwind_state *state,
@@ -167,6 +181,7 @@ unwind_next_frame_record(struct unwind_state *state)
/*
* Record this frame record's values.
*/
+ state->prev_pc = state->pc;
state->fp = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
state->pc = READ_ONCE(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 8));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 634279b3b03d..fbcb14539816 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
* Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <asm/unwind_hints.h>
+#include <asm-generic/orc_lookup.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -16,6 +18,122 @@
#include <asm/stack_pointer.h>
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
+static inline bool unwind_completed(struct unwind_state *state)
+{
+ if (state->fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(state->task)->stackframe) {
+ /* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER_VALIDATION
+
+static void unwind_check_reliable(struct unwind_state *state)
+{
+ unsigned long pc, fp;
+ struct orc_entry *orc;
+ bool adjust_pc = false;
+
+ if (unwind_completed(state))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * If a previous frame was unreliable, the CFA cannot be reliably
+ * computed anymore.
+ */
+ if (!state->reliable)
+ return;
+
+ pc = state->pc;
+
+ /* Don't let modules unload while we're reading their ORC data. */
+ preempt_disable();
+
+ orc = orc_find(pc);
+ if (!orc || (!orc->fp_offset && orc->type == UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_CALL)) {
+ /*
+ * If the final instruction in a function happens to be a call
+ * instruction, the return address would fall outside of the
+ * function. That could be the case here. This can happen, for
+ * instance, if the called function is a "noreturn" function.
+ * The compiler can optimize away the instructions after the
+ * call. So, adjust the PC so it falls inside the function and
+ * retry.
+ *
+ * We only do this if the current and the previous frames
+ * are call frames and not hint frames.
+ */
+ if (state->unwind_type == UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_CALL) {
+ pc -= 4;
+ adjust_pc = true;
+ orc = orc_find(pc);
+ }
+ }
+ if (!orc) {
+ state->reliable = false;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ state->unwind_type = orc->type;
+
+ if (!state->cfa) {
+ /* Set up the initial CFA and return. */
+ state->cfa = state->fp - orc->fp_offset;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Compute the next CFA and FP. */
+ switch (orc->type) {
+ case UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_CALL:
+ /* Normal call */
+ state->cfa += orc->sp_offset;
+ fp = state->cfa + orc->fp_offset;
+ break;
+
+ case UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_REGS:
+ /*
+ * pt_regs hint: The frame pointer points to either the
+ * synthetic frame within pt_regs or to the place where
+ * x29 and x30 are saved in the register save area in
+ * pt_regs.
+ */
+ state->cfa += orc->sp_offset;
+ fp = state->cfa + offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe) -
+ sizeof(struct pt_regs);
+ if (state->fp != fp) {
+ fp = state->cfa + offsetof(struct pt_regs, regs[29]) -
+ sizeof(struct pt_regs);
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case UNWIND_HINT_TYPE_IRQ_STACK:
+ /* Hint to unwind from the IRQ stack to the task stack. */
+ state->cfa = state->fp + orc->sp_offset;
+ fp = state->fp;
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ fp = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* Validate the actual FP with the computed one. */
+ if (state->fp != fp)
+ state->reliable = false;
+out:
+ if (state->reliable && adjust_pc)
+ state->pc = pc;
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER_VALIDATION */
+
+static void unwind_check_reliable(struct unwind_state *state)
+{
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER_VALIDATION */
+
/*
* Start an unwind from a pt_regs.
*
@@ -77,11 +195,9 @@ static inline void unwind_init_from_task(struct unwind_state *state,
static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
{
struct task_struct *tsk = state->task;
- unsigned long fp = state->fp;
int err;
- /* Final frame; nothing to unwind */
- if (fp == (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(tsk)->stackframe)
+ if (unwind_completed(state))
return -ENOENT;
err = unwind_next_frame_record(state);
@@ -116,18 +232,23 @@ static int notrace unwind_next(struct unwind_state *state)
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind_next);
-static void notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state,
+static int notrace unwind(struct unwind_state *state, bool need_reliable,
stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry, void *cookie)
{
- while (1) {
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
+ while (1) {
+ if (need_reliable && !state->reliable)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (!consume_entry(cookie, state->pc))
break;
ret = unwind_next(state);
+ if (need_reliable && !ret)
+ unwind_check_reliable(state);
if (ret < 0)
break;
}
+ return ret;
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(unwind);
@@ -216,5 +337,37 @@ noinline notrace void arch_stack_walk(stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
}
- unwind(&state, consume_entry, cookie);
+ unwind(&state, false, consume_entry, cookie);
+}
+
+noinline notrace int arch_stack_walk_reliable(
+ stack_trace_consume_fn consume_entry,
+ void *cookie, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ struct stack_info stacks[] = {
+ stackinfo_get_task(task),
+ STACKINFO_CPU(irq),
+#if defined(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK)
+ STACKINFO_CPU(overflow),
+#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) && defined(CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE)
+ STACKINFO_SDEI(normal),
+ STACKINFO_SDEI(critical),
+#endif
+ };
+ struct unwind_state state = {
+ .stacks = stacks,
+ .nr_stacks = ARRAY_SIZE(stacks),
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ if (task == current)
+ unwind_init_from_caller(&state);
+ else
+ unwind_init_from_task(&state, task);
+ unwind_check_reliable(&state);
+
+ ret = unwind(&state, true, consume_entry, cookie);
+
+ return ret == -ENOENT ? 0 : -EINVAL;
}
--
2.25.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list