[PATCH 2/8] clk: qcom: gdsc: Enable supply reglator in GPU GX handler

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 21.12.2023 14:16, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 21.12.2023 14:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 15:01, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21.12.2023 04:50, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>> The GX GDSC is modelled to aid the GMU in powering down the GPU in the
>>>> event that the GPU crashes, so that it can be restarted again. But in
>>>> the event that the power-domain is supplied through a dedicated
>>>> regulator (in contrast to being a subdomin of another power-domain),
>>>> something needs to turn that regulator on, both to make sure things are
>>>> powered and to match the operation in gdsc_disable().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande at quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 8 +++++++-
>>>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>>>> index 5358e28122ab..d1139c895503 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
>>>> @@ -557,7 +557,13 @@ void gdsc_unregister(struct gdsc_desc *desc)
>>>>   */
>>>>  int gdsc_gx_do_nothing_enable(struct generic_pm_domain *domain)
>>> I suppose the name is confusing now..
>>>
>>> But at the same time I can't come up with anything that's less than
>>> like 6 words..
>>
>> gdsc_gx_enable() ;-)
> except not really only gx and not really enable :(
> 
> gdsc_shared_enable would probably be closer to our current
> nomenclature..
but then VOTABLE also taps into the concept of "shared" :/

Konrad