[PATCH net v2 0/2] Fix phylink unloadable issue

Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh at linuxfoundation.org
Thu Dec 21 01:11:04 PST 2023


On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:51:07PM +0800, Gan, Yi Fang wrote:
> Add module_exit_stub() for phylink module.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> - Introduce a helper macro for module_exit() boilerplate
> 
> This series is the combination of following:
> v1 with empty phylink_exit():
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231127101603.807593-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com/
> v1 of module_exit_stub():
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212094352.2263283-1-yi.fang.gan@intel.com/

As I said before, no, this isn't ok.  Why just resubmit a patch when
it's already been rejected?

This patch series should NOT be accepted as-is, you know this!

Also, you are not following the documented and REQUIRED rules for Intel
developers to be submitting kernel patches, so on that reason alone
these need to be rejected.

Please work with the Intel internel developers to do this correctly if
you wish to submit this again in the future.

greg k-h



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list