[PATCH] drivers/perf: Remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API

[Christophe JAILLET]

ida_alloc() and ida_free() should be preferred to the deprecated
ida_simple_get() and ida_simple_remove().

This is less verbose.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet at wanadoo.fr>
---
 drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
index 5cf770a1bc31..9685645bfe04 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/fsl_imx9_ddr_perf.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
 
-	pmu->id = ida_simple_get(&ddr_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	pmu->id = ida_alloc(&ddr_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
 	name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL, DDR_PERF_DEV_NAME "%d", pmu->id);
 	if (!name) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(pmu->cpuhp_state);
 cpuhp_state_err:
 format_string_err:
-	ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
+	ida_free(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
 	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX9 DDR Perf PMU failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
 
-	ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
+	ida_free(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.34.1