[PATCH v3 11/25] arm64: enable ARCH_HAS_PKEYS on arm64

[Joey Gouly]

Hi,

Thanks to you and Mark for the comments so far!

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 03:25:17PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 04:34:56PM +0000, Joey Gouly wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5761fb48fd53
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Arm Ltd.
> > + *
> > + * Based on arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
> > +*/
> > +
> > +#ifndef _ASM_ARM64_PKEYS_H
> > +#define _ASM_ARM64_PKEYS_H
> > +
> > +#define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2)
> > +
> > +#define arch_max_pkey() 0
> > +
> > +int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
> > +		unsigned long init_val);
> > +
> > +static inline bool arch_pkeys_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > +	return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > +{
> > +	return -1;
> > +}
> 
> What's the point of these dummies? I guess they'll be populated later
> but I haven't reached that point. Could we not just leave them out for
> now and add the complete version directly? This would work better with
> an earlier comment to move the Kconfig entry towards the end of the
> series.

I think the suggestion to move the Kconfig to the end is good, and I agree that
it will probably remove these dummy implementations.

> 
> Also, they don't seem to match the generic include/linux/pkeys.h
> dummies. For example, vma_pkey() returns 0 in the generic version, -1
> here. Should they actually match?

If for some reason I need to keep them after the Kconfig move, I will look into
this further.

Thanks,
Joey