[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm: add overlay for icssg1 2nd port
Anwar, Md Danish
a0501179 at ti.com
Thu Dec 7 06:06:09 PST 2023
On 12/7/2023 6:57 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 13:49-20231207, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>> The am642-evm doesn't allow to enable 2 x CPSW3g ports and 2 x ICSSG1 ports
>> all together, so base k3-am642-evm.dts enables by default 2 x CPSW3g ports
>> and 1 x ICSSG1 ports, but it also possible to support 1 x CPSW3g ports and
>> 2 x ICSSG1 ports configuration.
>>
>> This patch adds overlay to support 1 x CPSW3g ports and 2 x ICSSG1 ports
>> configuration:
>> - disable 2nd CPSW3g port
>> - update CPSW3g pinmuxes to not use RGMII2
>> - disable mdio-mux-1 and define mdio-mux-2 to route ICSSG1 MDIO to the
>> shared DP83869 PHY
>> - add and enable ICSSG1 RGMII2 pinmuxes
>> - enable ICSSG1 MII1 port
>>
>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar at ti.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile | 2 +
>> .../dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtso | 80 +++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtso
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> index 5ef49b02c71f..99a4dce47f02 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/Makefile
>> @@ -35,12 +35,14 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am62x-sk-csi2-imx219.dtbo
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am62x-sk-hdmi-audio.dtbo
>>
>> # Boards with AM64x SoC
>> +k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dtbs := k3-am642-evm.dtb k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo
>
> Why not handle this for CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS alone? See commit
> b0044823a6607e535fdb083c89f487fbf183b171
>
I'll have to look into this.
I am merging this k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtbo with
k3-am642-evm.dtb because when I had posted patches for AM65x DTS, Andrew
had commented [1] saying we should not leave orphan dtbos and every dtbo
should be applied over some dtb by using `dtb- +=`.
Due to this I am applying the overlay on k3-am642-evm.dtb and creating
new dtb k3-am642-evm-icssg1.dtb which can be used when both ICSSG1 ports
are needed to be enabled.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca832fe3-d5cf-b075-324b-50da40794bb7@ti.com/
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-evm.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-phyboard-electra-rdk.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-sk.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-tqma64xxl-mbax4xxl.dtb
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am64-tqma64xxl-mbax4xxl-sdcard.dtbo
>> dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am64-tqma64xxl-mbax4xxl-wlan.dtbo
>> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_K3) += k3-am642-evm-icssg1.dtb
>>
>> # Boards with AM65x SoC
>> k3-am654-gp-evm-dtbs := k3-am654-base-board.dtb k3-am654-base-board-rocktech-rk101-panel.dtbo
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtso b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtso
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..6f33290c1ad6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm-icssg1-dualemac.dtso
>> @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/**
>> + * DT overlay for enabling 2nd ICSSG1 port on AM642 EVM
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Texas Instruments Incorporated - https://www.ti.com/
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +/plugin/;
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +#include "k3-pinctrl.h"
>> +
>> +&{/} {
>> + aliases {
>> + ethernet1 = "/icssg1-eth/ethernet-ports/port at 0";
>> + ethernet2 = "/icssg1-eth/ethernet-ports/port at 1";
>
> I don't understand what you are overriding here. isn't patch #2 in your
> series already introducing this in the base dts?
>
Sorry, My bad. I will remove this in v2.
>> + };
>> +
>> + mdio-mux-2 {
>> + compatible = "mdio-mux-multiplexer";
>> + mux-controls = <&mdio_mux>;
>> + mdio-parent-bus = <&icssg1_mdio>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + mdio at 0 {
>> + reg = <0x0>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + icssg1_phy2: ethernet-phy at 3 {
>> + reg = <3>;
>> + tx-internal-delay-ps = <250>;
>> + rx-internal-delay-ps = <2000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&main_pmx0 {
>> + icssg1_rgmii2_pins_default: icssg1-rgmii2-default-pins {
>> + pinctrl-single,pins = <
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0108, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (W11) PRG1_PRU1_GPO0.RGMII2_RD0 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x010c, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (V11) PRG1_PRU1_GPO1.RGMII2_RD1 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0110, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (AA12) PRG1_PRU1_GPO2.RGMII2_RD2 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0114, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (Y12) PRG1_PRU1_GPO3.RGMII2_RD3 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0120, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (U11) PRG1_PRU1_GPO6.RGMII2_RXC */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0118, PIN_INPUT, 2) /* (W12) PRG1_PRU1_GPO4.RGMII2_RX_CTL */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0134, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (AA10) PRG1_PRU1_GPO11.RGMII2_TD0 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0138, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (V10) PRG1_PRU1_GPO12.RGMII2_TD1 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x013c, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (U10) PRG1_PRU1_GPO13.RGMII2_TD2 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0140, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (AA11) PRG1_PRU1_GPO14.RGMII2_TD3 */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0148, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (Y10) PRG1_PRU1_GPO16.RGMII2_TXC */
>> + AM64X_IOPAD(0x0144, PIN_OUTPUT, 2) /* (Y11) PRG1_PRU1_GPO15.RGMII2_TX_CTL */
>> + >;
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> +&cpsw3g {
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&rgmii1_pins_default>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&cpsw_port2 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&mdio_mux_1 {
>> + status = "disabled";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&icssg1_eth {
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&icssg1_rgmii1_pins_default &icssg1_rgmii2_pins_default>;
>
> Grrr... No! I have been cleaning up after you folks and you folks should
> take notice.
>
> pinctrl-0 = <&icssg1_rgmii1_pins_default>, <&icssg1_rgmii2_pins_default>;
>
Sorry, I was not aware of this. I will change it in v2.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +&icssg1_emac1 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + phy-handle = <&icssg1_phy2>;
>> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
>> index 04d1c0602d31..90867090e725 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ mdio_mux: mux-controller {
>> mux-gpios = <&exp1 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> };
>>
>> - mdio-mux-1 {
>> + mdio_mux_1: mdio-mux-1 {
>
> Commit message doesn't warn me for this change.
Sure. I will add details of this in commit message saying `Add label
name 'mdio_mux_1' for 'mdio-mux-1' node so that the node 'mdio-mux-1'
can be disabled in the overlay using the label name.`
>> compatible = "mdio-mux-multiplexer";
>> mux-controls = <&mdio_mux>;
>> mdio-parent-bus = <&cpsw3g_mdio>;
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list