[PATCH V2 5/7] coresight: tmc: Move ACPI support from AMBA driver to platform driver

[James Clark]

On 01/12/2023 06:20, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Add support for the tmc devices in the platform driver, which can then be
> used on ACPI based platforms. This change would now allow runtime power
> management for ACPI based systems. The driver would try to enable the APB
> clock if available.
> 
> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi at kernel.org>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
> Cc: James Clark <james.clark at arm.com>
> Cc: linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: coresight at lists.linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/amba.c                     |   2 -
>  .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c  | 130 +++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h   |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
[...]
> -static int tmc_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
> +static int __tmc_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res, void *dev_caps)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	u32 devid;
>  	void __iomem *base;
> -	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
>  	struct coresight_platform_data *pdata = NULL;
> -	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata;
> -	struct resource *res = &adev->res;
> +	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 };
>  	struct coresight_dev_list *dev_list = NULL;
>  
>  	ret = -ENOMEM;
> -	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!drvdata)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
>  
>  	/* Validity for the resource is already checked by the AMBA core */
>  	base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> @@ -487,8 +482,7 @@ static int tmc_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
>  		desc.type = CORESIGHT_DEV_TYPE_SINK;
>  		desc.subtype.sink_subtype = CORESIGHT_DEV_SUBTYPE_SINK_SYSMEM;
>  		desc.ops = &tmc_etr_cs_ops;
> -		ret = tmc_etr_setup_caps(dev, devid,
> -					 coresight_get_uci_data(id));
> +		ret = tmc_etr_setup_caps(dev, devid, dev_caps);
>  		if (ret)
>  			goto out;
[...]
> -module_amba_driver(tmc_driver);
> +static int tmc_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!drvdata)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	drvdata->pclk = coresight_get_enable_apb_pclk(&pdev->dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(drvdata->pclk))
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
> +	pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> +
> +	ret = __tmc_probe(&pdev->dev, res, NULL);

What effect does passing NULL here have? It seems like the dev_caps did
something useful when it's set to CORESIGHT_SOC_600_ETR_CAPS. Maybe
Suzuki knows as he added it?