[PATCH v4 03/36] arm64/gcs: Document the ABI for Guarded Control Stacks

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 02:11:07PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> Yes, this should work. Any invocation of clone() or clone3() without a
> shadow stack would disable GCS. What about the reverse, should GCS be
> enabled for a thread even if the clone3() caller has GCS disabled? I
> guess we shouldn't since GCS enabling depends on the prctl() state set
> previously.

It has a fairly obvious intended meaning so we could do it easily enough
but OTOH allowing it opens up the idea of people wanting to specify GCS
flags which starts to seem like more trouble than it's worth compared to
just having them do the prctl() in the new thread.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230823/53a6f5a4/attachment.sig>