[PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: pwm: Add binding for Allwinner D1/T113-S3/R329 PWM controller
Александр Шубин
privatesub2 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 22 23:57:07 PDT 2023
Hi Andre,
вт, 22 авг. 2023 г. в 12:49, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>:
>
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:32:16 +0300
> Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksandr,
>
> > Allwinner's D1, T113-S3 and R329 SoCs have a new pwm
> > controller witch is different from the previous pwm-sun4i.
> >
> > The D1 and T113 are identical in terms of peripherals,
> > they differ only in the architecture of the CPU core, and
> > even share the majority of their DT. Because of that,
> > using the same compatible makes sense.
> > The R329 is a different SoC though, and should have
> > a different compatible string added, especially as there
> > is a difference in the number of channels.
> >
> > D1 and T113s SoCs have one PWM controller with 8 channels.
> > R329 SoC has two PWM controllers in both power domains, one of
> > them has 9 channels (CPUX one) and the other has 6 (CPUS one).
> >
> > Add a device tree binding for them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml | 85 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..9512d4bed322
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/allwinner,sun20i-pwm.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Allwinner D1, T113-S3 and R329 PWM
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Aleksandr Shubin <privatesub2 at gmail.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + oneOf:
> > + - const: allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm
> > + - items:
> > + - const: allwinner,sun20i-r329-pwm
> > + - const: allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm
> > +
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + "#pwm-cells":
> > + const: 3
> > +
> > + clocks:
> > + items:
> > + - description: 24 MHz oscillator
> > + - description: Bus Clock
>
> The manual tells me that the new PWMs can also use APB0 as the
> input clock, which (finally!) allows PWM frequencies above 24 MHz.
> So we should have an explicit reference to that clock - even if the bus
> clock happens to be gated version of APB0.
Should I change it to something like this:
pwm: pwm at 2000c00 {
compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm";
reg = <0x02000c00 0x400>;
clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PWM>, <&dcxo>, <&ccu CLK_APB0>;
clock-names = "bus", "hosc", "apb0";
resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_PWM>;
#pwm-cells = <0x3>;
};
>
> Cheers,
> Andre
>
> > +
> > + clock-names:
> > + items:
> > + - const: hosc
> > + - const: bus
> > +
> > + resets:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + allwinner,pwm-channels:
> > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
> > + description: The number of PWM channels configured for this instance
> > + enum: [6, 9]
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > + - $ref: pwm.yaml#
> > +
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: allwinner,sun20i-r329-pwm
> > +
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - allwinner,pwm-channels
> > +
> > + else:
> > + properties:
> > + allwinner,pwm-channels: false
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - "#pwm-cells"
> > + - clocks
> > + - clock-names
> > + - resets
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> > + #include <dt-bindings/reset/sun20i-d1-ccu.h>
> > +
> > + pwm: pwm at 2000c00 {
> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-pwm";
> > + reg = <0x02000c00 0x400>;
> > + clocks = <&dcxo>, <&ccu CLK_BUS_PWM>;
> > + clock-names = "hosc", "bus";
> > + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_PWM>;
> > + #pwm-cells = <0x3>;
> > + };
> > +
> > +...
>
Cheers,
Aleksandr
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list