[PATCH v6 2/6] perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior
James Clark
james.clark at arm.com
Thu Aug 17 02:02:08 PDT 2023
On 16/08/2023 17:11, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:47:44PM +0100, James Clark escreveu:
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/cpuid-match.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>> +
>> +#include "arch-tests.h"
>> +#include "tests/tests.h"
>> +#include "util/header.h"
>> +
>> +int test__cpuid_match(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused,
>> + int subtest __maybe_unused)
>> +{
>> + /* midr with no leading zeros matches */
>> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x410fd0c0", "0x00000000410fd0c0"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* Upper case matches */
>> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x410fd0c0", "0x00000000410FD0C0"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* r0p0 = r0p0 matches */
>> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000410fd480"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* r0p1 > r0p0 matches */
>> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000410fd481"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* r1p0 > r0p0 matches*/
>> + if (strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd480", "0x00000000411fd480"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* r0p0 < r0p1 doesn't match */
>> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd481", "0x00000000410fd480"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* r0p0 < r1p0 doesn't match */
>> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000411fd480", "0x00000000410fd480"))
>> + return -1;
>> + /* Different CPU doesn't match */
>> + if (!strcmp_cpuid_str("0x00000000410fd4c0", "0x00000000430f0af0"))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
> ⬢[acme at toolbox perf-tools-next]$ git am ./v6_20230816_james_clark_perf_vendor_events_arm64_update_n2_and_v2_metrics_and_events_using_arm_telem.mbx
> Applying: perf test: Add a test for the new Arm CPU ID comparison behavior
> .git/rebase-apply/patch:93: new blank line at EOF.
> +
> warning: 1 line adds whitespace errors.
> ⬢[acme at toolbox perf-tools-next]$
>
> I'm removing it
Interesting that checkpatch.pl doesn't see that. Thanks for the fix.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list