[PATCH 1/3] crypto: stm32/hash - Properly handle pm_runtime_get failing

[Thomas BOURGOIN]

Hello,

On 8/9/23 12:58, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> I usually let maintainers decide if they want this Cc line and in
> practise the Fixes: line seems to be enough for the stable team to pick
> up a commit for backporting.

Ok, I thought this was required to apply the patch correctly on previous 
stable releases. (Someone asked me to do it on one of my previous patch)

> If your mail means I should resend the patch just to add the Cc: line,
> please tell me again. Should I resent patches 2 and 3 then, too?

No, patch 3 will break the driver on previous version because remove_new
does not exist.
I don't think it's mandatory for patch 2, it's an optimisation it does 
not fix something broken. The driver works as intended with the 
condition so no need to remove it.

Thomas