[PATCH v3 05/50] dt-bindings: clk: at91: add sam9x7 clock controller

[Varshini.Rajendran at microchip.com]

On 28/07/23 5:10 pm, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 28/07/2023 12:23, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add bindings for SAM9X7's pmc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml          | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> index c1bdcd9058ed..ce0d99503645 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/atmel,at91rm9200-pmc.yaml
>> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ properties:
>>                 - atmel,sama5d4-pmc
>>                 - microchip,sam9x60-pmc
>>                 - microchip,sama7g5-pmc
>> +              - microchip,sam9x7-pmc
>>             - const: syscon
> 
> Where is the change in allOf:if:then:? No need for it? Why? Where is the
> driver change?

Hi Krzysztof,

This SoC has a new pmc driver and is not dependent on any other 
compatible as a fallback. So I think adding it in the enum makes sense. 
Correct me if I am wrong. The driver is in the series. Apologies for 
breaking the thread. I will send another version following your advice 
about splitting up the patch series.
> 
> Please do not send huge series to 50 different people and subsystems.
> With your lack of threading it is so difficult to review.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.