[PATCH RFC v6 2/6] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions

Paolo Abeni pabeni at redhat.com
Thu Apr 27 01:05:11 PDT 2023


Hi,

On Mon, 2023-04-17 at 12:49 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> [resend with fixed CC list]
> 
> On Sun, 16 Apr 2023 18:23:15 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > > What is index? I thought you don't want an index and yet there is one,
> > > just scoped by random attributes :(  
> > 
> > Index internal within a single instance. Like Intel guys, they have 1
> > clock wired up with multiple DPLLs. The driver gives every DPLL index.
> > This is internal, totally up to the driver decision. Similar concept to
> > devlink port index.
> 
> devlink port index ended up as a pretty odd beast with drivers encoding
> various information into it, using locally grown schemes.
> 
> Hard no on doing that in dpll, it should not be exposed to the user.

I'm replying here just in case the even the above reply was lost.

I guess the last remark resolved this specific discussion.

@Vadim, @Arkadiusz, even if net-next is currently closed, there are no
restrictions for RFC patches: feel free to share v7 when it fits you
better!

Thanks,

Paolo




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list