[PATCH] kselftest/arm64: Add a smoke test for ptracing hardware break/watch points
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Apr 17 12:29:33 PDT 2023
There was a report that the hardware breakpoints and watch points weren't
reporting the debug architecture version as expected, they were reporting
a version of 0 which is not defined in the architecture. This happens
when running in a KVM guest if the host has a debug architecture version
not supported by KVM, it in turn confuses GDB which rejects any debug
architecture version it does not know about.
Add a test that covers that situation and while we're at it reports the
debug architecture version and number of slots available to aid with
figuring out problems that may arise.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
index be952511af22..abe4d58d731d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/ptrace.c
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#include "../../kselftest.h"
-#define EXPECTED_TESTS 7
+#define EXPECTED_TESTS 11
#define MAX_TPIDRS 2
@@ -132,6 +132,34 @@ static void test_tpidr(pid_t child)
}
}
+static void test_hw_debug(pid_t child, int type, const char *type_name)
+{
+ struct user_hwdebug_state state;
+ struct iovec iov;
+ int slots, arch, ret;
+
+ iov.iov_len = sizeof(state);
+ iov.iov_base = &state;
+
+ /* Should be able to read the values */
+ ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, type, &iov);
+ ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "read_%s\n", type_name);
+
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ /* Low 8 bits is the number of slots, next 4 bits the arch */
+ slots = state.dbg_info & 0xff;
+ arch = (state.dbg_info >> 8) & 0xf;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("%s version %d with %d slots\n", type_name,
+ arch, slots);
+
+ /* Zero is not currently architecturally valid */
+ ksft_test_result(arch, "%s_arch_set\n", type_name);
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s_arch_set\n");
+ }
+}
+
static int do_child(void)
{
if (ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, -1, NULL, NULL))
@@ -207,6 +235,8 @@ static int do_parent(pid_t child)
ksft_print_msg("Parent is %d, child is %d\n", getpid(), child);
test_tpidr(child);
+ test_hw_debug(child, NT_ARM_HW_WATCH, "NT_ARM_HW_WATCH");
+ test_hw_debug(child, NT_ARM_HW_BREAK, "NT_ARM_HW_BREAK");
ret = EXIT_SUCCESS;
---
base-commit: e8d018dd0257f744ca50a729e3d042cf2ec9da65
change-id: 20230414-arm64-test-hw-breakpoint-83fe02f607fc
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list