[PATCH 1/6] drm: bridge: samsung-dsim: Support multi-lane calculations
Lucas Stach
l.stach at pengutronix.de
Mon Apr 17 01:43:25 PDT 2023
Hi Adam,
Am Samstag, dem 15.04.2023 um 05:40 -0500 schrieb Adam Ford:
> If there is more than one lane, the HFP, HBP, and HSA is calculated in
> bytes/pixel, then they are divided amongst the different lanes with some
> additional overhead. This is necessary to achieve higher resolutions while
> keeping the pixel clocks lower as the number of lanes increase.
>
In the testing I did to come up with my patch "drm: bridge: samsung-
dsim: fix blanking packet size calculation" the number of lanes didn't
make any difference. My testing might be flawed, as I could only
measure the blanking after translation from MIPI DSI to DPI, so I'm
interested to know what others did here. How did you validate the
blanking with your patch? Would you have a chance to test my patch and
see if it works or breaks in your setup?
Regards,
Lucas
> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> index e0a402a85787..1ccbad4ea577 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@
> #define DSI_RX_FIFO_SIZE 256
> #define DSI_XFER_TIMEOUT_MS 100
> #define DSI_RX_FIFO_EMPTY 0x30800002
> +#define DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD 6
>
> #define OLD_SCLK_MIPI_CLK_NAME "pll_clk"
>
> @@ -879,13 +880,40 @@ static void samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(struct samsung_dsim *dsi)
> | DSIM_MAIN_VBP(m->vtotal - m->vsync_end);
> samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MVPORCH_REG, reg);
>
> - reg = DSIM_MAIN_HFP(m->hsync_start - m->hdisplay)
> - | DSIM_MAIN_HBP(m->htotal - m->hsync_end);
> - samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MHPORCH_REG, reg);
> + /*
> + * If there is more than one lane, the HFP, HBP, and HSA
> + * is calculated in bytes/pixel, then they are divided
> + * amongst the different lanes with some additional
> + * overhead correction
> + */
> + if (dsi->lanes > 1) {
> + u32 hfp, hbp, hsa;
> + int bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(dsi->format) / 8;
> +
> + hfp = ((m->hsync_start - m->hdisplay) * bpp) / dsi->lanes;
> + hfp -= (hfp > DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD) ? DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD : 0;
> +
> + hbp = ((m->htotal - m->hsync_end) * bpp) / dsi->lanes;
> + hbp -= (hbp > DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD) ? DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD : 0;
>
> - reg = DSIM_MAIN_VSA(m->vsync_end - m->vsync_start)
> - | DSIM_MAIN_HSA(m->hsync_end - m->hsync_start);
> - samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MSYNC_REG, reg);
> + hsa = ((m->hsync_end - m->hsync_start) * bpp) / dsi->lanes;
> + hsa -= (hsa > DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD) ? DSI_HSYNC_PKT_OVERHEAD : 0;
> +
> + reg = DSIM_MAIN_HFP(hfp) | DSIM_MAIN_HBP(hbp);
> + samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MHPORCH_REG, reg);
> +
> + reg = DSIM_MAIN_VSA(m->vsync_end - m->vsync_start)
> + | DSIM_MAIN_HSA(hsa);
> + samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MSYNC_REG, reg);
> + } else {
> + reg = DSIM_MAIN_HFP(m->hsync_start - m->hdisplay)
> + | DSIM_MAIN_HBP(m->htotal - m->hsync_end);
> + samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MHPORCH_REG, reg);
> +
> + reg = DSIM_MAIN_VSA(m->vsync_end - m->vsync_start)
> + | DSIM_MAIN_HSA(m->hsync_end - m->hsync_start);
> + samsung_dsim_write(dsi, DSIM_MSYNC_REG, reg);
> + }
> }
> reg = DSIM_MAIN_HRESOL(m->hdisplay, num_bits_resol) |
> DSIM_MAIN_VRESOL(m->vdisplay, num_bits_resol);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list