[PATCH 01/27] dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT6795
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Fri Apr 14 01:34:47 PDT 2023
On 14/04/2023 10:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 12/04/2023 13:27, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>>> Add a compatible string for MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795's display PWM
>>> block: this is the same as MT8173.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 4 +++-
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> index 0088bc8e7c54..153e146df7d4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml
>>> @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ properties:
>>> - mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm
>>> - mediatek,mt8183-disp-pwm
>>> - items:
>>> - - const: mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm
>>> + - mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm
>>
>> This does not look correct. You do not add compatible, you replace
>> breaking all mt8167-disp-pwm. At least it looks like this from context.
>
> I thought the old semantic to be:
>
> "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>
> and the new
>
> "mediatek,mt6795-disp-pwm" or "mediatek,mt8167-disp-pwm"
>
> . What am I missing?
The new is ok for mt6795 but it is not valid for mt8167.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list