[PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530: add port bindings for MT7988

Arınç ÜNAL arinc.unal at arinc9.com
Thu Apr 6 12:18:51 PDT 2023


On 6.04.2023 22:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/04/2023 10:01, arinc9.unal at gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal at arinc9.com>
>>
>> The switch on MT7988 has got only port 6 as a CPU port. The only phy-mode
>> to be used is internal. Add this.
>>
>> Some bindings are incorrect for this switch now, so move them to more
>> specific places.
>>
>> Address the incorrect information of which ports can be used as a user
>> port. Any port can be used as a user port.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal at arinc9.com>
>> ---
>>   .../bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml     | 63 ++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>> index 7045a98d9593..605888ce2bc6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/mediatek,mt7530.yaml
>> @@ -160,22 +160,6 @@ patternProperties:
>>         "^(ethernet-)?port@[0-9]+$":
>>           type: object
>>   
>> -        properties:
>> -          reg:
>> -            description:
>> -              Port address described must be 5 or 6 for CPU port and from 0 to 5
>> -              for user ports.
>> -
>> -        allOf:
>> -          - if:
>> -              required: [ ethernet ]
>> -            then:
>> -              properties:
>> -                reg:
>> -                  enum:
>> -                    - 5
>> -                    - 6
>> -
> 
> I have doubts that the binding is still maintainable/reviewable. First,
> why do you need all above patterns after removal of entire contents?

The 'type: object' item is still globally used. I'd have to define that 
on each definitions, I suppose?

> 
> Second, amount of if-then-if-then located in existing blocks (not
> top-level) is quite big. I counted if-then-using defs, where defs has
> patternProps-patternProps-if-then-if-then-properties.... OMG. :)

Yup, not much to do if we want to keep the information. I'm still 
maintaining this though. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Arınç



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list