[PATCH v3 3/6] clk: imx: imx8mp: Add audiomix block control

[Marek Vasut]

On 10/20/22 05:06, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 10:33 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/14/22 03:53, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Marek
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> +static const struct clk_parent_data clk_imx8mp_audiomix_pll_parents[]
>> = {
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "osc_24m", .name = "osc_24m" },
>>>> +       { .name = "dummy" },
>>>> +       { .name = "dummy" },
>>>> +       { .name = "dummy" },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct clk_parent_data
>> clk_imx8mp_audiomix_pll_bypass_sels[]
>>>> = {
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "sai_pll", .name = "sai_pll" },
>>>> +       { .fw_name = "sai_pll_ref_sel", .name = "sai_pll_ref_sel" },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define CLK_GATE(gname, cname)
>>   \
>>>> +       {
>>   \
>>>> +               gname"_cg",
>>   \
>>>> +               IMX8MP_CLK_AUDIOMIX_##cname,
>> \
>>>> +               { .fw_name = "ahb", .name = "ahb" }, NULL, 1,
>>   \
>>>>
>>>> { .fw_name = "audio_root_clk", .name = "audio_root_clk" }, NULL, 1,
>>>>        \
>>>>
>>>> Should be the 'audio_root_clk' better?
>>>>
>>>> Then the 'clocks' and 'clock-names' can be removed in dts node?
>>>>
>>>> Will you continue to follow up this patch series?
>>
>> Sure. Did anyone from NXP finally test this patch series, and can
>> provide useful review ?
>>
> 
> I have tested it, and I think "ahb" should be "audio_root_clk". others LGTM.

It seems those clock are actually called IMX8MP_CLK_AUDIO_AHB_ROOT in 
the NXP downstream BSP, so those clock do drive AHB, correct ? If so, we 
should keep the "ahb" name here, to differentiate them from already 
existing IMX8MP_CLK_AUDIO_AXI , which seem to drive the AXI part.