[PATCH 3/5] mms: sdhci-esdhc-imx: Fix SDHCI_RESET_ALL for CQHCI

Brian Norris briannorris at chromium.org
Wed Oct 19 14:56:48 PDT 2022


Hi,

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 07:22:04AM +0000, Bough Chen wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Norris <briannorris at chromium.org>
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> > @@ -1288,6 +1288,13 @@ static void esdhc_set_uhs_signaling(struct
> > sdhci_host *host, unsigned timing)
> > 
> >  static void esdhc_reset(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask)  {
> > +	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> > +	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> > +
> > +	if ((host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE) && (mask & SDHCI_RESET_ALL)
> > &&
> > +	    imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_CQHCI)
> 
> I think we can remove the condition " imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_CQHCI" here.
> According to code logic, host->mmc->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_CQE means it already contain imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_CQHCI

I don't know why I had this in the first place. Maybe just to be
double-sure that caps flags aren't getting set elsewhere (e.g., by the
core)? But you're right, and I've dropped this in v2.

Thanks,
Brian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list