[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: arm,pl18x: Document interrupt-names is ignored

[Marek Vasut]

On 10/14/22 18:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 13/10/2022 18:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Due to inconsistency of existing DTs regarding the content of this IP
>> interrupt-names DT property, document this such that interrupt-names
>> is not used by this IP bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>> ---
>> Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>> Cc: Andy Gross <agross at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio at somainline.org>
>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson at linaro.org>
>> Cc: Yann Gautier <yann.gautier at foss.st.com>
>> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-msm at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
>> To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>> V2: Add deprecated:false to interrupts: description
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> index 1e69a5a42439b..1c96da04f0e53 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arm,pl18x.yaml
>> @@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ properties:
>>         PIO (polled I/O) interrupt and occurs when the FIFO needs to be
>>         emptied as part of a bulk read from the card. Some variants have these
>>         two interrupts wired into the same line (logic OR) and in that case
>> -      only one interrupt may be provided.
>> +      only one interrupt may be provided. The interrupt-names property is
>> +      not used due to inconsistency of existing DTs regarding its content.
>> +    deprecated: false
> 
> Why do you add deprecated false? All properties are not deprecated by
> default. Did any other referenced schema make it deprecated?

Rob asked me to add it in V1 .