[EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] net: phylink: add phylink_set_mac_pm() helper

[Shenwei Wang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2022 11:07 AM
> To: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang at nxp.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet at google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba at kernel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni at redhat.com>; Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32 at gmail.com>;
> Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn.ch>; Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1 at gmail.com>;
> Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro at st.com>; Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>; Jose Abreu <joabreu at synopsys.com>;
> netdev at vger.kernel.org; linux-stm32 at st-md-mailman.stormreply.com; linux-
> arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; imx at lists.linux.dev
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] net: phylink: add phylink_set_mac_pm() helper
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 08:39:02AM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote:
> > Per Russell's suggestion, the implementation is changed from the
> > helper function to add an extra property in phylink_config structure
> > because this change can easily cover SFP usecase too.
> 
> Which tree are you aiming this for - net-next or net?
> 

The patch can be applied to both trees.  You can select the one which is easy to
go ahead.

Thanks,
Shenwei

> You should use [PATCH net ...] or [PATCH net-next ...] to indicate which tree
> you're aiming these patches for.
> 
> Please don't repost due to this unless you want it to go into the net tree, as net-
> next is currently closed.
> 
> --
> RMK's Patch system:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ar
> mlinux.org.uk%2Fdeveloper%2Fpatches%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cshenwei.
> wang%40nxp.com%7C9eb73c5218ab4ca2e25908daad350702%7C686ea1d3bc2
> b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638012740506537030%7CUnknown%7
> CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ
> XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZUtXNJ8wXqhi9Tvcg51uJJvcS
> 9CbJt6yxF3zjuoEfuQ%3D&reserved=0
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!