[RFC PATCH v3 1/6] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions
Jiri Pirko
jiri at resnulli.us
Wed Oct 12 23:55:34 PDT 2022
Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:12:43PM CEST, vfedorenko at novek.ru wrote:
>On 12.10.2022 07:44, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:31:25PM CEST, vfedorenko at novek.ru wrote:
>> > On 11.10.2022 09:47, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 10:32:22AM CEST, jiri at resnulli.us wrote:
>> > > > Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 09:54:26PM CEST, vfedorenko at novek.ru wrote:
>> > > > > On 10.10.2022 10:18, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > > > > > Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 03:17:59AM CEST, vfedorenko at novek.ru wrote:
>> > > > > > > From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed at fb.com>
>> > >
>> > > [...]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > > I see your point. We do have hardware which allows changing type of SMA
>> > > > > connector, and even the direction, each SMA could be used as input/source or
>> > > > > output of different signals. But there are limitation, like not all SMAs can
>> > > > > produce IRIG-B signal or only some of them can be used to get GNSS 1PPS. The
>> > > >
>> > > > Okay, so that is not the *type* of source, but rather attribute of it.
>> > > > Example:
>> > > >
>> > > > $ dpll X show
>> > > > index 0
>> > > > type EXT
>> > > > signal 1PPS
>> > > > supported_signals
>> > > > 1PPS 10MHz
>> > > >
>> > > > $ dpll X set source index 1 signal_type 10MHz
>> > > > $ dpll X show
>> > > > index 0
>> > > > type EXT
>> > > > signal 10MHz
>> > > > supported_signals
>> > > > 1PPS 10MHz
>> > > >
>> > > > So one source with index 0 of type "EXT" (could be "SMA", does not
>> > > > matter) supports 1 signal types.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thinking about this more and to cover the case when one SMA could be
>> > > > potencially used for input and output. It already occured to me that
>> > > > source/output are quite similar, have similar/same attributes. What if
>> > > > they are merged together to say a "pin" object only with extra
>> > > > PERSONALITY attribute?
>> > > >
>> > > > Example:
>> > > >
>> > > > -> DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET - dump
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > >
>> > > > <- DPLL_CMD_PIN_GET
>> > > >
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_INDEX 0
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_TYPE EXT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 1PPS (selected signal)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_SIGNALS (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 1PPS
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 10MHZ
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (selected personality)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_PERSONALITIES (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (note this supports both input and
>> > > > output)
>> > > >
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_INDEX 1
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_TYPE EXT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 10MHz (selected signal)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_SIGNALS (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 1PPS
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 10MHZ
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED (selected personality - not
>> > > > connected currently)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_PERSONALITIES (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT (note this supports only input)
>> > > >
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_INDEX 2
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_TYPE GNSS
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 1PPS (selected signal)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_SIGNALS (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL 1PPS
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT (selected personality - note this is
>> > > > now he selected source, being only
>> > > > pin with INPUT personality)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_PERSONALITIES (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT (note this supports only input)
>> > > >
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_INDEX 3
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_TYPE SYNCE_ETH_PORT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_NETDEV_IFINDEX 20
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (selected personality)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_PERSONALITIES (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (note this supports both input and
>> > > > output)
>> > > >
>> > > > ATTR_DEVICE_ID X
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_INDEX 4
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_TYPE SYNCE_ETH_PORT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_NETDEV_IFINDEX 30
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (selected personality)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_PERSONALITIES (nest)
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY DISCONNECTED
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY OUTPUT (note this supports both input and
>> > > > output)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > This allows the user to actually see the full picture:
>> > > > 1) all input/output pins in a single list, no duplicates
>> > > > 2) each pin if of certain type (ATTR_PIN_TYPE) EXT/GNSS/SYNCE_ETH_PORT
>> > > > 3) the pins that can change signal type contain the selected and list of
>> > > > supported signal types (ATTR_PIN_SIGNAL, ATTR_PIN_SUPPORTED_SIGNALS)
>> > > > 4) direction/connection of the pin to the DPLL is exposed over
>> > > > ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY. For each pin, the driver would expose it can
>> > > > act as INPUT/OUTPUT and even more, it can indicate the pin can
>> > > > disconnect from DPLL entirely (if possible).
>> > > > 5) user can select the source by setting ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY of certain
>> > > > pin to INPUT. Only one pin could be set to INPUT and that is the
>> > > > souce of DPLL.
>> > > > In case no pin have personality set to INPUT, the DPLL is
>> > > > free-running.
>> > >
>> > > Okay, thinking about it some more, I would leave the source select
>> > > indepentent from the ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY and selectable using device
>> > > set cmd and separate attribute. It works better even more when consider
>> > > autoselect mode.
>> > >
>> > > Well of course only pins with ATTR_PIN_PERSONALITY INPUT could be
>> > > selected as source.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Overall, I agree with this proposal, and as I've already said, the work is
>> > going exactly the same way - to introduce pin object with separate set of
>> > attributes.
>> > I don't really like 'PERSONALITY' naming, I think we have to find a better
>> > name. It looks like DIRECTION is slightly better. And the
>> > CONNECTED/DISCONNECTED should be different attribute. And we also need
>>
>> Yeah, it is a matter of implementation. I just thought that this is
>> possible to be done in a single attribute, because when the pin is
>> disconnected, the direction has no meaning.
>>
>>
>> > attribute PRIORITY to be able to configure (or hint) auto-select mode. There
>>
>> Sure, I didn't put the PRIORITY attribute to the example, but I believe
>> it is very straightforward extension to add it.
>>
>>
>> > are also special objects called muxes, which consist of several inputs and
>> > one output, but they cannot synthonise signal, only pass one of the inputs to
>> > output. We are still in kind of discussion whether to have them as separate
>> > objects, or extend the amount of pins of DPLL device in this case. The
>> > problem again in the auto-select mode and priorities. It would be great to
>> > hear your thoughts about such objects.
>>
>> Does the mux have any attribute/configuration valuable for the user.
>> If yes, it might make sense to have it as a separate object. Then we
>> can have it as a tree of object of type MUX with leaves of PIN.
>
>Yes, that was the first thought, but implementation details are not great for now.
>
>> The question really is, if the user needs to know about muxes and work
>> with them, or they can be abstracted out by the driver.
>
>Both ways will work I believe. It's more like our will to give users full
>picture or hide it somehow with the implementation.
>>
>> Could you elaborate a bit more why auto-select mode and priorities are
>> problematic with muxes in picture?
>
>AFAIU, some mux devices are not smart enough to make a decision suitable for
>autoselect for the pins they have. In this case the autoselect process is
>done in the DPLL device, which selects mux and not the pin directly. At the
>same time there could be muxes that are smart enough to make a decision, and
>it will be autoselect on top of autoselect (and several more layers) and it
>doesn't sound great to me. I believe Arkadiusz will explain the mux a bit
>better.
>From what you write in this reply, I have a feeling that these details
are not really interesting for user to see. So I tend to lean forward to
abstract this out and leave the details to HW/FW/driver.
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > > >
>> > > > This would introduce quite nice flexibility, exposes source/output
>> > > > capabilities and provides good visilibity of current configuration.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > interface was created to cover such case. I believe we have to improve it to
>> > > > > cover SyncE configuration better, but I personally don't have SyncE hardware
>> > > > > ready to test and that's why I have to rely on suggestions from yours or
>> > > > > Arkadiusz's experience. From what I can see now there is need for special
>> > > > > attribute to link source to net device, and I'm happy to add it. In case of
>> > > > > fixed configuration of sources, the device should provide only one type as
>> > > > > supported and that's it.
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > [...]
>> >
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list