REGRESSION in 6.0-rc7 caused by patch "ARM/dma-mapping: use dma-direct unconditionally"
Marek Behún
kabel at kernel.org
Mon Oct 3 08:25:33 PDT 2022
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 15:11:44 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux at armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 09:30:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 05:02:05PM +0200, Marek Behún wrote:
> > > It seems that the null pointer dereference comes from the data variable
> > > having zero value. We assign
> > > data = (u8 *)(uintptr_t)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
> >
> > I never see any assignment to ->buf_cookie in the driver, what am
> > I missing?
>
> I think Marek's setup (like my setups) use the hardware buffer manager,
> and it's hardware that fills in the "buf_cookie", which is supposed to
> be the virtual address of the buffer.
>
> Each buffer supplied to the hardware buffer manager is supposed to
> contain the virtual address in the first 32-bit word in that buffer.
>
> This is done by mvneta_bm_construct():
>
> /* In order to update buf_cookie field of RX descriptor properly,
> * BM hardware expects buf virtual address to be placed in the
> * first four bytes of mapped buffer.
> */
> *(u32 *)buf = (u32)buf;
>
> immediately prior to dma_map_single(..., DMA_FROM_DEVICE) is called.
>
> If I had to guess, I would suggest that this write is being lost via
> cache invalidation, and given that the hardware BM both reads and
> writes this buffer, DMA_FROM_DEVICE is not correct, it should be
> DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL.
>
> Changing that is probably going to need DMA_FROM_DEVICE also changed
> elsewhere in the mvneta_bm and mvneta driver.
>
> I'm not in a position where I could test that out. Marek?
>
Hello Russell,
thanks for your suggestion!
Adding Pali, since he has some information (see at the end of this
message).
The attached patch seems to solve the null-pointer dereference.
I booted into single user mode and enabled eth2. Before it caused the
NULL pointer dereference after link got up, not it does not happen.
But I am still encountering the freeze after booting into system.
Maybe these are different bugs?
I am thinking whether we don't need something similar like
7bea67a99430 ("ARM: dts integrator: Fix DMA ranges")
also for mvebu.
I seem to remember Pali talking about how the ranges defined in some
upstream mvebu-tree, using MBUS_ID() macros, are incorrect.
Pali, what do you remember about this?
Marek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mvneta-dma-bidir.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1820 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20221003/703544c9/attachment.bin>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list