[PATCH v2] dt-bindings: display: Convert fsl,imx-fb.txt to dt-schema

Rob Herring robh at kernel.org
Wed Nov 30 06:53:13 PST 2022


On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:04:14 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Compared to the txt description this adds clocks and clock-names to
> match reality.
> 
> Note that fsl,imx-lcdc was picked as the new name as this is the actual
> hardware's name. There will be a new binding implementing the saner drm
> concept that is supposed to supersede this legacy fb binding
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes since v1, sent with Message-Id:
>  - mention clock stuff being added (Philipp)
>  - dropped some quotes (Rob)
>  - fix specification of compatible
>    (I kept claiming though that imx21 isn't compatible to imx1. While
>    that might be true, I don't have an i.MX1 to check the details and
>    currently the imx*.dtsi don't claim that compatibility.)
> 
> I tried to implement the suggestion by Rob to formalize the display
> binding. But I learned that this doesn't change how the display property
> is formalized in the fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml (which is just a phandle without
> means to specify that it should point to a node which fulfills a certain
> binding.)
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  .../bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-fb.txt       |  57 ----------
>  .../bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml    | 102 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-fb.txt
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml
> 

Applied, thanks!



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list