[PATCH] arm64: mm: Align PGDs to at least 64 bytes

Ard Biesheuvel ardb at kernel.org
Tue Nov 29 03:18:20 PST 2022


On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 10:51, Will Deacon <will at kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 05:50:48PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:56:18PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > My copy of the ARM ARM (DDI 0487G.a) no longer describes the 64 byte
> >
> > G.a is nearly two years old. You may want to upgrade to H.a ;).
>
> H.a is over eight months old. You may want to upgrade to I.a :p
>
> (Actually, don't bother -- it's written using these unreadable rule things.
> H.a, all is forgiven).
>
> > > minimum alignment of root page tables as being conditional on whether
> > > 52-bit physical addressing is supported and enabled, even though I seem
> > > to remember that this was the case formerly (and our code suggests the
> > > same).
> >
> > The wording in the ARM ARM implies that it's only needed if we go beyond
> > 48 bits for the base address:
> >
> >   A translation table must be aligned to the size of the table, except
> >   that when using a translation table base address larger than 48 bits
> >   the minimum alignment of a table containing fewer than eight entries
> >   is 64 bytes.
>
> FWIW, this wording is the same in I.a.
>
> > But I'm fine with the patch, always forcing the 64 byte alignment. With
> > the 'max_t' instead of 'max' (or whatever solves Anshuman's error):
> >
> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>
> Happy to take a v2 or add the max_t() to this version.
>

In spite of the off-list discussion we just had where we concluded
that this patch is not necessary, I think we still do:
in revision I.a, I still see the following wording

D17.2.147 TTBR1_EL1, Translation Table Base Register 1 (EL1)

------- Note --------
 A translation table is required to be aligned to the size of the
table. If a table contains fewer than
eight entries, it must be aligned on a 64 byte address boundary.


with no mention whatsoever regarding this requirement being
conditional on the configured PA range.

I'll respin and resend.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list