[PATCH v12 1/2] drivers/coresight: Add UltraSoc System Memory Buffer driver

Suzuki K Poulose suzuki.poulose at arm.com
Mon Nov 14 05:59:37 PST 2022


On 14/11/2022 13:06, hejunhao wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/11/14 18:49, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> On 11/11/2022 22:06, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> Hi Junhao,
>>>
>>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>>>
>>> [auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
>>> [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.1-rc4 next-20221111]
>>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>>>
>>> url: 
>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Junhao-He/Add-support-for-UltraSoc-System-Memory-Buffer/20221109-215158
>>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git 
>>> for-next
>>> patch link: 
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221109135008.9485-2-hejunhao3%40huawei.com
>>> patch subject: [PATCH v12 1/2] drivers/coresight: Add UltraSoc System 
>>> Memory Buffer driver
>>> config: arm64-randconfig-s033-20221111
>>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>>> reproduce:
>>>          wget 
>>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>>          # apt-get install sparse
>>>          # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
>>>          # 
>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/49ede03fd874b65deca5382ea84c3377188136da
>>>          git remote add linux-review 
>>> https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>>>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review 
>>> Junhao-He/Add-support-for-UltraSoc-System-Memory-Buffer/20221109-215158
>>>          git checkout 49ede03fd874b65deca5382ea84c3377188136da
>>>          # save the config file
>>>          mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-12.1.0 
>>> make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' 
>>> O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/hwtracing/coresight/
>>>
>>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
>>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>>>
>>> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:113:33: sparse: sparse: 
>>>>> cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression
>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: sparse: 
>>>>> incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected 
>>>>> void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>> expected void const *
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: sparse: 
>>>>> incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected 
>>>>> void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>> expected void const *
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>> sparse: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) 
>>> @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem * @@
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: 
>>> expected void const *
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:354:17: sparse: got 
>>> void [noderef] __iomem *
>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: sparse: 
>>>>> incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected 
>>>>> void [noderef] __iomem *base @@     got void * @@
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: 
>>> expected void [noderef] __iomem *base
>>>     drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c:463:14: sparse: got 
>>> void *
>>>
>>> vim +/__iomem +113 drivers/hwtracing/coresight/ultrasoc-smb.c
>>>
>>>      89
>>>      90    static ssize_t smb_read(struct file *file, char __user 
>>> *data, size_t len,
>>>      91                loff_t *ppos)
>>>      92    {
>>>      93        struct smb_drv_data *drvdata = 
>>> container_of(file->private_data,
>>>      94                        struct smb_drv_data, miscdev);
>>>      95        struct smb_data_buffer *sdb = &drvdata->sdb;
>>>      96        struct device *dev = &drvdata->csdev->dev;
>>>      97        ssize_t to_copy = 0;
>>>      98
>>>      99        mutex_lock(&drvdata->mutex);
>>>     100
>>>     101        if (!sdb->data_size) {
>>>     102            smb_update_data_size(drvdata);
>>>     103            if (!sdb->data_size)
>>>     104                goto out;
>>>     105        }
>>>     106
>>>     107        to_copy = min(sdb->data_size, len);
>>>     108
>>>     109        /* Copy parts of trace data when read pointer wrap 
>>> around SMB buffer */
>>>     110        if (sdb->rd_offset + to_copy > sdb->buf_size)
>>>     111            to_copy = sdb->buf_size - sdb->rd_offset;
>>>     112
>>>   > 113        if (copy_to_user(data, (void *)sdb->buf_base + 
>>> sdb->rd_offset,
>>>     114                 to_copy)) {
>>>     115            dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to copy data to user\n");
>>>     116            to_copy = -EFAULT;
>>>     117            goto out;
>>>     118        }
>>>     119
>>
>> Please could we replace this with copy_to_user_fromio() ?
>>
>> Suzuki
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CoreSight mailing list -- coresight at lists.linaro.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to coresight-leave at lists.linaro.org
>> .
>>
> Hi Suzuki,
> 
> This is a cache memory,  due to improper use of "__iomem" , the sparse 
> generates warnings.
> I has fix it in v13.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221114090316.63157-2-hejunhao3@huawei.com/

I don't see a ChangeLog mentioning that this change. Please make sure
you accurately describe the changes (especially fixes like these).

Thanks
Suzuki

> 
> Best regards,
> Junhao.
> 
> 
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list