[PATCH bpf v2 1/5] bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext extension

[Martin KaFai Lau]

On 11/7/22 1:20 AM, Yang Jihong wrote:
> For ARM32 architecture, if data width of kfunc return value is 32 bits,
> need to do explicit zero extension for high 32-bit, insn_def_regno should
> return dst_reg for BPF_JMP type of BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL. Otherwise,
> opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32 returns -EFAULT, resulting in BPF failure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1 at huawei.com>
> ---
>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 7f0a9f6cb889..bac37757ffca 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,9 @@ static int insn_def_regno(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
>   {
>   	switch (BPF_CLASS(insn->code)) {
>   	case BPF_JMP:
> +		if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL)
> +			return insn->dst_reg;

This does not look right.  A kfunc can return void.  The btf type of the kfunc's 
return value needs to be checked against "void" first?
Also, this will affect insn_has_def32(), does is_reg64 (called from 
insn_has_def32) need to be adjusted also?


For patch 2, as replied earlier in v1, I would separate out the prog that does 
__sk_buff->sk and use the uapi's bpf.h instead of vmlinux.h since it does not 
need CO-RE.

This set should target for bpf-next instead of bpf.

> +		fallthrough;
>   	case BPF_JMP32:
>   	case BPF_ST:
>   		return -1;