[PATCH] pwm: lpc18xx-sct: Fix a comment to match code

[Vladimir Zapolskiy]

On 11/8/22 17:30, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> lpc18xx_pwm_probe() only ensures clk_rate <= NSEC_PER_SEC, the following
> reasoning is right even under this slightly lesser condition.
> 
> Fixes: 8933d30c5f46 ("pwm: lpc18xx: Fix period handling")
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig at pengutronix.de>
> ---
>   drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> index 763f2e3a146d..378e1df944dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc18xx-sct.c
> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void lpc18xx_pwm_config_duty(struct pwm_chip *chip,
>   	u32 val;
>   
>   	/*
> -	 * With clk_rate < NSEC_PER_SEC this cannot overflow.
> +	 * With clk_rate <= NSEC_PER_SEC this cannot overflow.
>   	 * With duty_ns <= period_ns < max_period_ns this also fits into an u32.
>   	 */
>   	val = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(duty_ns, lpc18xx_pwm->clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC);

Acked-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz at mleia.com>

--
Best wishes,
Vladimir