[PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: nvmem: Fix example

Miquel Raynal miquel.raynal at bootlin.com
Fri Nov 4 09:38:28 PDT 2022


Despite not being listed nor required within the top level nvmem yaml
file, the "compatible" property is mandatory and is actually enforced by
all the nvmem provider bindings.

Unfortunately, the lack of compatible in the nvmem.yaml to level
description file lead to the example not matching anything and thus not
being checked at all.

Let's pick a compatible almost randomly (one which is already used with
the qfprom label) to make the example at least valid on a semantic
point of view and getting it checked.

Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal at bootlin.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
index 1eb22dba364c..0455506fc30f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/nvmem.yaml
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ examples:
       #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
 
       qfprom: eeprom at 700000 {
+          compatible = "qcom,msm8974-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
           #address-cells = <1>;
           #size-cells = <1>;
           reg = <0x00700000 0x100000>;
-- 
2.34.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list