[PATCH v6 4/6] mfd: tps65219: Add driver for TI TPS65219 PMIC

[jerome Neanne]

On 31/10/2022 12:00, Lee Jones wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2c1cf92e92ac
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65219.h

>> +/**
>> + * struct tps65219 - tps65219 sub-driver chip access routines
>> + *
>> + * Device data may be used to access the TPS65219 chip
>> + *
>> + * @dev MFD device
>> + * @regmap Regmap for accessing the device registers
>> + * @irq_data Regmap irq data used for the irq chip
>> + * @nb notifier block for the restart handler
>> + */
> 
> This header needs work.
I'm not sure to get your point here. Just something like below to match 
format or do you expect more:

/**
  * struct tps65219 - tps65219 sub-driver chip access routines
  *
  * Device data may be used to access the TPS65219 chip
  *
  * @dev: MFD device
  * @regmap: Regmap for accessing the device registers
  * @irq_data: Regmap irq data used for the irq chip
  * @nb: notifier block for the restart handler
  */

> 
> Can you try an compile with W=1 please.
This raise one warning on mfd:
drivers/mfd/tps65219.c:28:12: warning: ‘tps65219_soft_shutdown’ defined 
but not used [-Wunused-function]
    28 | static int tps65219_soft_shutdown(struct tps65219 *tps)
       |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
soft_shutdown has been validated and is used in TI baseline even if not 
hooked in upstream version further to this review:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220825150224.826258-5-msp@baylibre.com/

It was a TI requirement to implement it...
Let me know if you want me to remove this function or if we can keep it 
like this.