[PATCH] kvm/arm: Fix pvtime documentation

[Marc Zyngier]

On Fri, 04 Nov 2022 01:48:21 +0000,
Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 11/3/22 22:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > No, this is the correct course of action. There isn't any point in
> > having an *unrelated* change in a separate series. This is a
> > standalone change, posted as a standalone patch.
> > 
> >> Please reroll your series [2] with suggestion applied.
> > 
> > Or not.
> > 
> 
> You mean the series before this patch have already been applied,
> right?

This change is 100% independent from the series you quoted. Why should
there be a dependency between the two?

As for respinning the series at this stage for a documentation
formatting issue, this is pretty pointless, and only clutters people's
Inbox with redundant versions...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.