[PATCH 1/3] arm64: exynos: Add new compatible string for Exynos3250 SoC.
Tommaso Merciai
tommaso.merciai at amarulasolutions.com
Thu Nov 3 03:41:21 PDT 2022
Hi Aakarsh,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 06:36:00PM +0530, Aakarsh Jain wrote:
> Exynos3250 uses the same compatible as Exynos5420, but both
> the MFC IPs found in these SoC are different interms of clock
> property. So using same compatible for both SoC is not correct.
> Lets have a separate compatible for Exynos3250 and Exynos5420
> to differentiate these SoCs.
>
> Suggested-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar at samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aakarsh Jain <aakarsh.jain at samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> We are already in process of converting this txt file to yaml.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/
> 20221011122516.32135-2-aakarsh.jain at samsung.com/
> modifying this txt binding for completeness.
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> index aa54c8159d9f..4ff1898e5a51 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/s5p-mfc.txt
> @@ -11,9 +11,10 @@ Required properties:
> (a) "samsung,mfc-v5" for MFC v5 present in Exynos4 SoCs
> (b) "samsung,mfc-v6" for MFC v6 present in Exynos5 SoCs
> (c) "samsung,mfc-v7" for MFC v7 present in Exynos5420 SoC
> - (d) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
> - (e) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
> - (f) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC
> + (d) "samsung,exynos3250-mfc" for MFC v7 present in Exynos3250 SoC
> + (e) "samsung,mfc-v8" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5800 SoC
> + (f) "samsung,exynos5433-mfc" for MFC v8 present in Exynos5433 SoC
> + (g) "samsung,mfc-v10" for MFC v10 present in Exynos7880 SoC
>
> - reg : Physical base address of the IP registers and length of memory
> mapped region.
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai at amarulasolutions.com>
Regards,
Tommaso
--
Tommaso Merciai
Embedded Linux Engineer
tommaso.merciai at amarulasolutions.com
__________________________________
Amarula Solutions SRL
Via Le Canevare 30, 31100 Treviso, Veneto, IT
T. +39 042 243 5310
info at amarulasolutions.com
www.amarulasolutions.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list