[PATCH v6 02/21] dt-bindings: Add binding for gunyah hypervisor

Jassi Brar jassisinghbrar at gmail.com
Tue Nov 1 09:23:35 PDT 2022


On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:20 PM Elliot Berman <quic_eberman at quicinc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jassi,
>
> On 10/27/2022 7:33 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>  > On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 1:59 PM Elliot Berman
> <quic_eberman at quicinc.com> wrote:
>  > .....
>  >> +
>  >> +        gunyah-resource-mgr at 0 {
>  >> +            compatible = "gunyah-resource-manager-1-0",
> "gunyah-resource-manager";
>  >> +            interrupts = <GIC_SPI 3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, /* TX
> full IRQ */
>  >> +                         <GIC_SPI 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; /* RX
> empty IRQ */
>  >> +            reg = <0x00000000 0x00000000>, <0x00000000 0x00000001>;
>  >> +                  /* TX, RX cap ids */
>  >> +        };
>  >>
>  > All these resources are used only by the mailbox controller driver.
>  > So, this should be the mailbox controller node, rather than the
>  > mailbox user.> One option is to load gunyah-resource-manager as a
> module that relies
>  > on the gunyah-mailbox provider. That would also avoid the "Allow
>  > direct registration to a channel" hack patch.
>
> A message queue to another guest VM wouldn't be known at boot time and
> thus couldn't be described on the devicetree.
>
I think you need to implement of_xlate() ... or please tell me what
exactly you need to specify in the dt.

thnx.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list