[PATCH v18 1/6] soc: mediatek: mutex: add common interface for modules setting
moudy.ho
moudy.ho at mediatek.com
Fri May 27 02:21:25 PDT 2022
On Wed, 2022-05-25 at 11:27 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Moudy:
>
> On Thu, 2022-05-12 at 16:41 +0800, Moudy Ho wrote:
> > In order to allow multiple modules to operate MUTEX hardware
> > through
> > a common interfrace, a flexible index "mtk_mutex_table_index" needs
> > to
> > be added to replace original component ID so that like DDP and MDP
> > can add their own MUTEX table settings independently.
> >
> > In addition, 4 generic interface "mtk_mutex_set_mod",
> > "mtk_mutex_set_sof",
> > "mtk_mutex_clear_mod" and "mtk_mutex_clear_sof" have been added,
> > which is
> > expected to replace the "mtk_mutex_add_comp" and
> > "mtk_mutex_remove_comp"
> > pair originally dedicated to DDP in the future.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho at mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> > angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c | 88
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h | 22 +++++++
> > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > index aaf8fc1abb43..a62ac1811419 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,8 @@ struct mtk_mutex_data {
> > const unsigned int *mutex_sof;
> > const unsigned int mutex_mod_reg;
> > const unsigned int mutex_sof_reg;
> > + const unsigned int *mutex_table_mod;
> > + const unsigned int *mutex_table_sof;
> > const bool no_clk;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -530,6 +532,92 @@ void mtk_mutex_release(struct mtk_mutex
> > *mutex)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_release);
> >
> > +static int mtk_mutex_write_mod(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx, bool
> > clear)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct
> > mtk_mutex_ctx,
> > + mutex[mutex->id]);
> > + unsigned int reg;
> > + unsigned int offset;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(&mtx->mutex[mutex->id] != mutex);
> > +
> > + if (idx < MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_RDMA0 ||
> > + idx >= MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MAX) {
> > + dev_err(mtx->dev, "Not supported MOD table index : %d",
> > idx);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mtx->data->mutex_mod_reg,
> > + mutex->id);
> > + reg = readl_relaxed(mtx->regs + offset);
> > +
> > + if (clear)
> > + reg &= ~BIT(mtx->data->mutex_table_mod[idx]);
> > + else
> > + reg |= BIT(mtx->data->mutex_table_mod[idx]);
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(reg, mtx->regs + offset);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int mtk_mutex_set_mod(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx)
> > +{
> > + return mtk_mutex_write_mod(mutex, idx, false);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_set_mod);
>
> Why not just export symbol of mtk_mutex_write_mod() and drop
> mtk_mutex_set_mod()/mtk_mutex_clear_mod()?
>
Hi CK,
Thanks for your review, I'll simplify this part in the next version.
> > +
> > +int mtk_mutex_clear_mod(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx)
> > +{
> > + return mtk_mutex_write_mod(mutex, idx, true);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_clear_mod);
> > +
> > +int mtk_mutex_write_sof(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx, bool clear)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_mutex_ctx *mtx = container_of(mutex, struct
> > mtk_mutex_ctx,
> > + mutex[mutex->id]);
> > + unsigned int sof_id, val;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(&mtx->mutex[mutex->id] != mutex);
> > +
> > + if (idx < MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_RDMA0 ||
> > + idx >= MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MAX) {
> > + dev_err(mtx->dev, "Not supported SOF table index : %d",
> > idx);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sof_id = mtx->data->mutex_table_sof[idx];
>
> Why do you map each idx to a sof? For each idx, we could choose sof
> by
> different application. I would like to change parameter
> mtk_mutex_table_index to mtk_mutex_sof_index.
>
> Regards,
> CK
>
I'll separate another index for SOF and revise setting function.
Regards,
Moudy
> > +
> > + if (clear)
> > + val = MUTEX_SOF_SINGLE_MODE;
> > + else
> > + val = mtx->data->mutex_sof[sof_id];
> > +
> > + writel_relaxed(val, mtx->regs +
> > + DISP_REG_MUTEX_SOF(mtx->data->mutex_sof_reg,
> > mutex->id));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int mtk_mutex_set_sof(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx)
> > +{
> > + return mtk_mutex_write_sof(mutex, idx, false);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_set_sof);
> > +
> > +int mtk_mutex_clear_sof(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx)
> > +{
> > + return mtk_mutex_write_sof(mutex, idx, true);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_mutex_clear_sof);
> > +
> > static int mtk_mutex_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h
> > b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h
> > index 6fe4ffbde290..f174452212d6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.h
> > @@ -10,6 +10,20 @@ struct regmap;
> > struct device;
> > struct mtk_mutex;
> >
> > +enum mtk_mutex_table_index {
> > + /* MDP table index */
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_RDMA0,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_RSZ0,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_RSZ1,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_TDSHP0,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_WROT0,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_WDMA,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_AAL0,
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MDP_CCORR0,
> > +
> > + MUTEX_TABLE_IDX_MAX /* ALWAYS keep at the end */
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_mutex *mtk_mutex_get(struct device *dev);
> > int mtk_mutex_prepare(struct mtk_mutex *mutex);
> > void mtk_mutex_add_comp(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > @@ -22,5 +36,13 @@ void mtk_mutex_unprepare(struct mtk_mutex
> > *mutex);
> > void mtk_mutex_put(struct mtk_mutex *mutex);
> > void mtk_mutex_acquire(struct mtk_mutex *mutex);
> > void mtk_mutex_release(struct mtk_mutex *mutex);
> > +int mtk_mutex_set_mod(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx);
> > +int mtk_mutex_clear_mod(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx);
> > +int mtk_mutex_set_sof(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx);
> > +int mtk_mutex_clear_sof(struct mtk_mutex *mutex,
> > + enum mtk_mutex_table_index idx);
> >
> > #endif /* MTK_MUTEX_H */
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list