[PATCH] perf/marvell_cn10k: Add MPAM support for TAD PMU
Rob Herring
robh at kernel.org
Mon May 23 09:37:33 PDT 2022
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 08:27:38PM +0530, Tanmay Jagdale wrote:
> The TAD PMU supports following counters that can be filtered by MPAM
> partition id.
How are you setting the PARTID? There's no support yet in the kernel to
set it.
> - (0x1a) tad_alloc_dtg : Allocations to DTG.
> - (0x1b) tad_alloc_ltg : Allocations to LTG.
> - (0x1c) tad_alloc_any : Total allocations to DTG/LTG.
> - (0x1d) tad_hit_dtg : DTG hits.
> - (0x1e) tad_hit_ltg : LTG hits.
> - (0x1f) tad_hit_any : Hit in LTG/DTG.
> - (0x20) tad_tag_rd : Total tag reads.
>
> Add a new 'partid' attribute of 16-bits to get the partition id
> passed from perf tool. This value would be stored in config1 field
> of perf_event_attr structure.
>
> Example:
> perf stat -e tad/tad_alloc_any,partid=0x12/ <program>
How would userspace get the 0x12 value?
>
> - Drop read of TAD_PRF since we don't have to preserve any
> bit fields and always write an updated value.
> - Update register offsets of TAD_PRF and TAD_PFC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay at marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> index 282d3a071a67..f552e6bffcac 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> @@ -18,10 +18,12 @@
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> -#define TAD_PFC_OFFSET 0x0
> +#define TAD_PFC_OFFSET 0x800
> #define TAD_PFC(counter) (TAD_PFC_OFFSET | (counter << 3))
> -#define TAD_PRF_OFFSET 0x100
> +#define TAD_PRF_OFFSET 0x900
> #define TAD_PRF(counter) (TAD_PRF_OFFSET | (counter << 3))
> +#define TAD_PRF_MATCH_PARTID (1 << 8)
> +#define TAD_PRF_PARTID_NS (1 << 10)
> #define TAD_PRF_CNTSEL_MASK 0xFF
> #define TAD_MAX_COUNTERS 8
Does this h/w block follow the MPAM specification or just uses PARTID in
its own way?
Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list