[PATCH v7 13/19] dt-bindings: reset: mediatek: Add infra_ao reset index for MT8192/MT8195

[Rex-BC Chen]

On Sat, 2022-05-21 at 12:23 +0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Chen-Yu Tsai (2022-05-19 20:10:35)
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:58 AM Rex-BC Chen <
> > rex-bc.chen at mediatek.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hello Stephen,
> > > 
> > > this patch will have conflict with Matthias's commit branch for
> > > include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8192-resets.h.
> > > 
> > > It's on linux-next.
> > > 
> > > I have fix it in this version, but I think there will be a merge
> > > conflict if you pick my series in this run.
> > > 
> > > 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/include/dt-bindings/reset/mt8192-resets.h?h=next-20220519&id=19c66219e4d5b813ebbd28621cfe9c450659ded7__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!xFfRxOWRAvhQMzoKxqRu8xFsMZLpVZEoK0WZBKeMOoeRGBjKphSL2tox-8zWlRwytjtEImTo1VB1f38wwj8XSlyKIw$
> > >  
> > 
> > The commit in question is in Matthias's v5.18-next/dts64 branch,
> > which also
> > has the v5.18-next-dts64 tag. The PR for this tag was already
> > picked up
> > by the soc maintainers, so I guess we could consider it stable.
> > 
> > Matthias, what do you think? Give an ack for the patch to go
> > through the
> > clk tree with the tag merged in as dependency? There's a compile
> > time
> > dependency between this and the next patch so we can't just split
> > them
> > into different trees.
> > 
> 
> It's pretty late to land something that has cross tree dependencies
> like
> that so I guess we'll just take up this patch series after the merge
> window closes.

Hello Stephen,

Thanks for your big help!
I will send v8 to modify comments from Nícolas.

BRs,
Rex