[PATCH v2 1/4] regmap: provide regmap_field helpers for simple bit operations
Li Chen
lchen.firstlove at zohomail.com
Sun May 22 20:30:59 PDT 2022
Hi Samuel,
---- On Sun, 22 May 2022 20:09:55 -0700 Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org> wrote ----
> Hi,
>
> On 5/22/22 9:23 PM, Li Chen wrote:
> > From: Li Chen <lchen at ambarella.com>
> >
> > We have set/clear/test operations for regmap, but not for regmap_field yet.
> > So let's introduce regmap_field helpers too.
> >
> > In many instances regmap_field_update_bits() is used for simple bit setting
> > and clearing. In these cases the last argument is redundant and we can
> > hide it with a static inline function.
> >
> > This adds three new helpers for simple bit operations: set_bits,
> > clear_bits and test_bits (the last one defined as a regular function).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Chen <lchen at ambarella.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/regmap.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> > index 5e12f7cb5147..a37d6041b7bd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c
> > @@ -2208,6 +2208,28 @@ int regmap_field_update_bits_base(struct regmap_field *field,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_field_update_bits_base);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * regmap_field_test_bits() - Check if all specified bits are set in a
> > + * register field.
> > + *
> > + * @field: Register field to operate on
> > + * @bits: Bits to test
> > + *
> > + * Returns -1 if the underlying regmap_field_read() fails, 0 if at least one of the
> > + * tested bits is not set and 1 if all tested bits are set.
> > + */
> > +int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field, unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int val, ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_field_read(field, &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return (val & bits) == bits;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_field_test_bits);
> > +
> > /**
> > * regmap_fields_update_bits_base() - Perform a read/modify/write cycle a
> > * register field with port ID
> > diff --git a/include/linux/regmap.h b/include/linux/regmap.h
> > index de81a94d7b30..10b410734d9e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/regmap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/regmap.h
> > @@ -1324,6 +1324,22 @@ static inline int regmap_field_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > NULL, false, false);
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int regmap_field_set_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > + unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + return regmap_field_update_bits_base(field, bits, 0, NULL, false,
> > + false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int regmap_field_clear_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > + unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + return regmap_field_update_bits_base(field, bits, bits, NULL, false,
> > + false);
>
> The contents of these two functions are swapped when compared to their names.
Thanks for spotting this out!
Fixed in v3.
Regards,
Li
>
> Regards,
> Samuel
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field, unsigned int bits);
> > +
> > static inline int
> > regmap_field_force_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > unsigned int mask, unsigned int val)
> > @@ -1757,6 +1773,27 @@ regmap_field_force_update_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline int regmap_field_set_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > + unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int regmap_field_clear_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > + unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int regmap_field_test_bits(struct regmap_field *field,
> > + unsigned int bits)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "regmap API is disabled");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int regmap_fields_write(struct regmap_field *field,
> > unsigned int id, unsigned int val)
> > {
> >
>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list