[PATCH] vfio: Remove VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Fri May 20 04:02:23 PDT 2022
On 2022-05-10 17:55, Jason Gunthorpe via iommu wrote:
> This control causes the ARM SMMU drivers to choose a stage 2
> implementation for the IO pagetable (vs the stage 1 usual default),
> however this choice has no visible impact to the VFIO user.
Oh, I should have read more carefully... this isn't entirely true. Stage
2 has a different permission model from stage 1, so although it's
arguably undocumented behaviour, VFIO users that know enough about the
underlying system could use this to get write-only mappings if they so wish.
There may potentially also be visible differences in translation
performance between stages, although I imagine that's firmly over in the
niche of things that users might look at for system validation purposes,
rather than for practical usefulness.
> Further qemu
> never implemented this and no other userspace user is known.
>
> The original description in commit f5c9ecebaf2a ("vfio/iommu_type1: add
> new VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU IOMMU type") suggested this was to "provide
> SMMU translation services to the guest operating system" however the rest
> of the API to set the guest table pointer for the stage 1 was never
> completed, or at least never upstreamed, rendering this part useless dead
> code.
>
> Since the current patches to enable nested translation, aka userspace page
> tables, rely on iommufd and will not use the enable_nesting()
> iommu_domain_op, remove this infrastructure. However, don't cut too deep
> into the SMMU drivers for now expecting the iommufd work to pick it up -
> we still need to create S2 IO page tables.
>
> Remove VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU and everything under it including the
> enable_nesting iommu_domain_op.
>
> Just in-case there is some userspace using this continue to treat
> requesting it as a NOP, but do not advertise support any more.
This also seems a bit odd, especially given that it's not actually a
no-op; surely either it's supported and functional or it isn't?
In all honesty, I'm not personally attached to this code either way. If
this patch had come 5 years ago, when the interface already looked like
a bit of a dead end, I'd probably have agreed more readily. But now,
when we're possibly mere months away from implementing the functional
equivalent for IOMMUFD, which if done right might be able to support a
trivial compat layer for this anyway, I just don't see what we gain from
not at least waiting to see where that ends up. The given justification
reads as "get rid of this code that we already know we'll need to bring
back in some form, and half-break an unpopular VFIO ABI because it
doesn't do *everything* that its name might imply", which just isn't
convincing me.
Thanks,
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 16 ----------------
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 16 ----------------
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 10 ----------
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 12 +-----------
> include/linux/iommu.h | 3 ---
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> It would probably make sense for this to go through the VFIO tree with Robin's
> ack for the SMMU changes.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 627a3ed5ee8fd1..b901e8973bb4ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2724,21 +2724,6 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
> return group;
> }
>
> -static int arm_smmu_enable_nesting(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> -{
> - struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
> - if (smmu_domain->smmu)
> - ret = -EPERM;
> - else
> - smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED;
> - mutex_unlock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
> {
> return iommu_fwspec_add_ids(dev, args->args, 1);
> @@ -2865,7 +2850,6 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> .flush_iotlb_all = arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all,
> .iotlb_sync = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync,
> .iova_to_phys = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
> - .enable_nesting = arm_smmu_enable_nesting,
> .free = arm_smmu_domain_free,
> }
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> index 568cce590ccc13..239e6f6585b48d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -1507,21 +1507,6 @@ static struct iommu_group *arm_smmu_device_group(struct device *dev)
> return group;
> }
>
> -static int arm_smmu_enable_nesting(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> -{
> - struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> - int ret = 0;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
> - if (smmu_domain->smmu)
> - ret = -EPERM;
> - else
> - smmu_domain->stage = ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED;
> - mutex_unlock(&smmu_domain->init_mutex);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> static int arm_smmu_set_pgtable_quirks(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> unsigned long quirks)
> {
> @@ -1600,7 +1585,6 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
> .flush_iotlb_all = arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all,
> .iotlb_sync = arm_smmu_iotlb_sync,
> .iova_to_phys = arm_smmu_iova_to_phys,
> - .enable_nesting = arm_smmu_enable_nesting,
> .set_pgtable_quirks = arm_smmu_set_pgtable_quirks,
> .free = arm_smmu_domain_free,
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 857d4c2fd1a206..f33c0d569a5d03 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -2561,16 +2561,6 @@ static int __init iommu_init(void)
> }
> core_initcall(iommu_init);
>
> -int iommu_enable_nesting(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> -{
> - if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - if (!domain->ops->enable_nesting)
> - return -EINVAL;
> - return domain->ops->enable_nesting(domain);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_enable_nesting);
> -
> int iommu_set_pgtable_quirks(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> unsigned long quirk)
> {
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 9394aa9444c10c..ff669723b0488f 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> uint64_t num_non_pinned_groups;
> wait_queue_head_t vaddr_wait;
> bool v2;
> - bool nesting;
> bool dirty_page_tracking;
> bool container_open;
> struct list_head emulated_iommu_groups;
> @@ -2207,12 +2206,6 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> if (!domain->domain)
> goto out_free_domain;
>
> - if (iommu->nesting) {
> - ret = iommu_enable_nesting(domain->domain);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_domain;
> - }
> -
> ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> if (ret)
> goto out_domain;
> @@ -2546,9 +2539,7 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> switch (arg) {
> case VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU:
> break;
> - case VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU:
> - iommu->nesting = true;
> - fallthrough;
> + case __VFIO_RESERVED_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU:
> case VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU:
> iommu->v2 = true;
> break;
> @@ -2634,7 +2625,6 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_check_extension(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> switch (arg) {
> case VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU:
> case VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU:
> - case VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU:
> case VFIO_UNMAP_ALL:
> case VFIO_UPDATE_VADDR:
> return 1;
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 9208eca4b0d1ac..51cb4d3eb0d391 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -272,7 +272,6 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> * @iotlb_sync: Flush all queued ranges from the hardware TLBs and empty flush
> * queue
> * @iova_to_phys: translate iova to physical address
> - * @enable_nesting: Enable nesting
> * @set_pgtable_quirks: Set io page table quirks (IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_*)
> * @free: Release the domain after use.
> */
> @@ -300,7 +299,6 @@ struct iommu_domain_ops {
> phys_addr_t (*iova_to_phys)(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> dma_addr_t iova);
>
> - int (*enable_nesting)(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> int (*set_pgtable_quirks)(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> unsigned long quirks);
>
> @@ -496,7 +494,6 @@ extern int iommu_page_response(struct device *dev,
> extern int iommu_group_id(struct iommu_group *group);
> extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_group_default_domain(struct iommu_group *);
>
> -int iommu_enable_nesting(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> int iommu_set_pgtable_quirks(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> unsigned long quirks);
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index fea86061b44e65..6e0640f0a4cad7 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> #define VFIO_EEH 5
>
> /* Two-stage IOMMU */
> -#define VFIO_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU 6 /* Implies v2 */
> +#define __VFIO_RESERVED_TYPE1_NESTING_IOMMU 6 /* Implies v2 */
>
> #define VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_v2_IOMMU 7
>
>
> base-commit: c5eb0a61238dd6faf37f58c9ce61c9980aaffd7a
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list