[PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi at arm.com]
> Sent: 13 May 2022 10:50
> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>; rafael at kernel.org;
> joro at 8bytes.org
> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi at huawei.com>;
> Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun at huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi at vger.kernel.org;
> iommu at lists.linux-foundation.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm at huawei.com>;
> will at kernel.org; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang at huawei.com>;
> steven.price at arm.com; Sami.Mujawar at arm.com; jon at solid-run.com;
> eric.auger at redhat.com; laurentiu.tudor at nxp.com; hch at infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> [with Christoph's correct email address]
> 
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2022-05-10 08:23, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > > Hi Joerg/Robin,
> > >
> > > I think this series is now ready to be merged. Could you please let
> > > me know if there is anything missing.
> >
> > Fine by me - these patches have had enough review and testing now that
> > even if anything else did come up, I think it would be better done as
> > follow-up work on the merged code.
> 
> Given the ACPICA dependency I believe it is best for this series
> to go via the ACPI tree, right ?
> 
> I assume there are all the required ACKs for that to happen.

The SMMUv3/SMMU related changes (patches 6 - 9) still doesn't have
explicit ACK from maintainers other than the go ahead above from Robin.

Just thought of highlighting it as not sure that will be an issue or not.

Thanks,
Shameer