[PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: sun8i-r40: Add "cpu-supply" node for sun8i-r40 based board

[Maxime Ripard]

On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 03:48:50PM +0800, qianfan wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2022/5/13 15:38, Maxime Ripard 写道:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 03:18:58PM +0800, qianfanguijin at 163.com wrote:
> > > From: qianfan Zhao <qianfanguijin at 163.com>
> > > 
> > > sun8i-r40 actived cpufreq feature now, let's add "cpu-supply" node on
> > > board.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao <qianfanguijin at 163.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts | 4 ++++
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-feta40i.dtsi          | 4 ++++
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-t3-cqa3t-bv3.dts          | 4 ++++
> > >   arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-v40-bananapi-m2-berry.dts | 4 ++++
> > >   4 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts
> > > index a6a1087a0c9b..4f30018ec4a2 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-r40-bananapi-m2-ultra.dts
> > > @@ -113,6 +113,10 @@ &ahci {
> > >   	status = "okay";
> > >   };
> > > +&cpu0 {
> > > +	cpu-supply = <&reg_dcdc2>;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > This will break bisection on those boards. Indeed, you added the OPPs on
> > the first patch, and if you only apply that patch, the boards in the
> > second patch will be missing their CPU regulator. The kernel will then
> > ramp up the frequency to the highest OPP, but will not change the
> > voltage, resulting in a crash.
>
> This is a good point and I will merge those two patch.

That's not what I meant to say. Those two patches are great separated.
You can invert them though.

> > There's a similar issue for all the boards that don't have a regulator
> > in the first place.
> > 
> > The way we worked around this for the other SoCs is to have a DTSI with
> > the OPPs with a frequency higher than what U-Boot boots with (1008MHz?),
> > and only include that DTSI on boards that have a CPU regulator hooked in.
>
> Is this really necessary? It seems like every board based on sun8i-r40
> have a cpu regulator.

This probably won't be the case whenever someone starts a new design,
and then they'll face random crashes for no apparent reason, and waste a
lot of time in the process.

Whereas the alternative is that you would be missing some OPPs,
something that is fairly easy to figure out.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20220513/9d0a23f7/attachment.sig>