[PATCH V2 2/7] xen/grants: support allocating consecutive grants
Oleksandr
olekstysh at gmail.com
Wed May 11 23:11:49 PDT 2022
On 12.05.22 00:09, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Hello Boris
>
> On 5/11/22 2:00 PM, Oleksandr wrote:
>>
>> On 07.05.22 21:19, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
>>
>> Hello Boris, Stefano
>>
>>
>>> From: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
>>>
>>> For support of virtio via grant mappings in rare cases larger mappings
>>> using consecutive grants are needed. Support those by adding a bitmap
>>> of free grants.
>>>
>>> As consecutive grants will be needed only in very rare cases (e.g. when
>>> configuring a virtio device with a multi-page ring), optimize for the
>>> normal case of non-consecutive allocations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes RFC -> V1:
>>> - no changes
>>> Changes V1 -> V2:
>>> - no changes
>>
>>
>> May I please ask for the review here?
>
>
>
> I had a quick look but I am stuck on get_free_seq(), I need to stare
> at it some more. Unless someone else reviews this, I will try to get
> to this in the next couple of days.
Thank you!
>
>
>
> One thing I did notice is
>
>
>>
>>> @@ -1452,6 +1624,13 @@ int gnttab_init(void)
>>> }
>>> }
>>> + i = gnttab_interface->grefs_per_grant_frame *
>>> max_nr_grant_frames;
>>> + gnttab_free_bitmap = bitmap_zalloc(i, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!gnttab_free_bitmap) {
>>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>>> + goto ini_nomem;
>>> + }
>
>
> This overwrites 'i' and will break error handling at ini_nomem.
Indeed, will fix. Thank you for pointing this out.
>
>
> -boris
>
>
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list