[PATCH -next] arm64: add missing header dependencies
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Wed May 11 01:30:31 PDT 2022
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:39:55AM +0800, cuigaosheng wrote:
> Do you know which commit is causing this error?
>
> 9cce7a435f89 arm64: CPU support I got the error when building a module with
> processor.h on arm64 and the module calls the KSTK_ESP macro,
I assume that's an out-of-tree module?
Looking at v5.18-rc5, the only users of KSTK_ESP() on arm64 are built in:
| [mark at lakrids:~/src/linux]% git grep KSTK_ESP
| arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) \
| arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->sp)
| arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) task_pt_regs(tsk)->ARM_sp
| arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) user_stack_pointer(task_pt_regs(tsk))
| arch/csky/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->usp)
| arch/h8300/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk) == current ? rdusp() : (tsk)->thread.usp)
| arch/hexagon/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (pt_psp(task_pt_regs(tsk)))
| arch/ia64/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.ksp)
| arch/m68k/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk) == current ? rdusp() : (tsk)->thread.usp)
| arch/microblaze/include/asm/processor.h:# define KSTK_ESP(task) (task_sp(task))
| arch/mips/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->regs[29])
| arch/nios2/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.kregs->sp)
| arch/openrisc/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->sp)
| arch/parisc/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs.gr[30])
| arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.regs? (tsk)->thread.regs->gpr[1]: 0)
| arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->sp)
| arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->gprs[15])
| arch/sh/include/asm/processor_32.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->regs[15])
| arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_32.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) ((tsk)->thread.kregs->u_regs[UREG_FP])
| arch/sparc/include/asm/processor_64.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->u_regs[UREG_FP])
| arch/um/include/asm/stacktrace.h: return (unsigned long *)KSTK_ESP(task);
| arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(task) (task_pt_regs(task)->sp)
| arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:extern unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task);
| arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:unsigned long KSTK_ESP(struct task_struct *task)
| arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) KSTK_REG(tsk, HOST_SP)
| arch/xtensa/include/asm/processor.h:#define KSTK_ESP(tsk) (task_pt_regs(tsk)->areg[1])
| fs/proc/array.c: esp = KSTK_ESP(task);
| mm/util.c: return (vma->vm_start <= KSTK_ESP(t) && vma->vm_end >= KSTK_ESP(t));
... or is that module being added in another tree at the moment?
Thanks,
Mark.
> we can also add
> additional header file dependencies(linux/sched/task_stack.h) in the module to
> avoid this error. Maybe perfecting header file dependencies of processor.h is a
> better option? Thanks,
>
> 在 2022/5/10 18:40, Will Deacon 写道:
>
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 02:17:51PM +0800, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
>
> We get one error when building module with processor.h:
>
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:263:36: error: implicit declaration of function ‘task_stack_page’;
> ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:266:42: note: in expansion of macro ‘task_pt_regs’
> #define KSTK_ESP(tsk) user_stack_pointer(task_pt_regs(tsk))
>
> task_stack_page is declared in linux/sched/task_stack.h, so this patch
> add the missing header dependencies.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1 at huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Do you know which commit is causing this error? I haven't seen any other
> reports, but it's hard to know which tree should take your patch as it
> stands.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index 73e38d9a540c..1c239841c4d6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/build_bug.h>
> #include <linux/cache.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> #include <linux/stddef.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/thread_info.h>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
> .
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list