[PATCH 3/7] irqchip/stm32-exti: remove EMR register access for stm32mp15
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Tue May 10 11:38:32 PDT 2022
On Tue, 10 May 2022 17:41:19 +0100,
Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo at foss.st.com> wrote:
>
> From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>
> C1EMRx registers are not accessible on STM32MP15x.
And what happens if they are accessed? What are these registers for?
(notice a pattern here?)
M.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo at foss.st.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> index 1145f064faa8..c8003f4f0457 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
> @@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ static const struct stm32_exti_drv_data stm32h7xx_drv_data = {
>
> static const struct stm32_exti_bank stm32mp1_exti_b1 = {
> .imr_ofst = 0x80,
> - .emr_ofst = 0x84,
> .rtsr_ofst = 0x00,
> .ftsr_ofst = 0x04,
> .swier_ofst = 0x08,
> @@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static const struct stm32_exti_bank stm32mp1_exti_b1 = {
>
> static const struct stm32_exti_bank stm32mp1_exti_b2 = {
> .imr_ofst = 0x90,
> - .emr_ofst = 0x94,
> .rtsr_ofst = 0x20,
> .ftsr_ofst = 0x24,
> .swier_ofst = 0x28,
> @@ -152,7 +150,6 @@ static const struct stm32_exti_bank stm32mp1_exti_b2 = {
>
> static const struct stm32_exti_bank stm32mp1_exti_b3 = {
> .imr_ofst = 0xA0,
> - .emr_ofst = 0xA4,
> .rtsr_ofst = 0x40,
> .ftsr_ofst = 0x44,
> .swier_ofst = 0x48,
> @@ -792,7 +789,8 @@ stm32_exti_chip_data *stm32_exti_chip_init(struct stm32_exti_host_data *h_data,
> * clear registers to avoid residue
> */
> writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->imr_ofst);
> - writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
> + if (stm32_bank->emr_ofst)
> + writel_relaxed(0, base + stm32_bank->emr_ofst);
>
> pr_info("%pOF: bank%d\n", node, bank_idx);
>
> --
> 2.36.0
>
>
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list