[PATCH v1 5/5] selftests/arm64: Use switch statements in mte_common_util.c

[Mark Brown]

In the MTE tests there are several places where we use chains of if
statements to open code what could be written as switch statements, move
over to switch statements to make the idiom clearer.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c     | 23 +++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
index 6ff4c4bcbff1..00ffd34c66d3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/mte_common_util.c
@@ -128,13 +128,16 @@ static void *__mte_allocate_memory_range(size_t size, int mem_type, int mapping,
 	int prot_flag, map_flag;
 	size_t entire_size = size + range_before + range_after;
 
-	if (mem_type != USE_MALLOC && mem_type != USE_MMAP &&
-	    mem_type != USE_MPROTECT) {
+	switch (mem_type) {
+	case USE_MALLOC:
+		return malloc(entire_size) + range_before;
+	case USE_MMAP:
+	case USE_MPROTECT:
+		break;
+	default:
 		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid allocate request\n");
 		return NULL;
 	}
-	if (mem_type == USE_MALLOC)
-		return malloc(entire_size) + range_before;
 
 	prot_flag = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
 	if (mem_type == USE_MMAP)
@@ -287,13 +290,19 @@ int mte_switch_mode(int mte_option, unsigned long incl_mask)
 		ksft_print_msg("FAIL: Invalid incl_mask %lx\n", incl_mask);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
+
 	en = PR_TAGGED_ADDR_ENABLE;
-	if (mte_option == MTE_SYNC_ERR)
+	switch (mte_option) {
+	case MTE_SYNC_ERR:
 		en |= PR_MTE_TCF_SYNC;
-	else if (mte_option == MTE_ASYNC_ERR)
+		break;
+	case MTE_ASYNC_ERR:
 		en |= PR_MTE_TCF_ASYNC;
-	else if (mte_option == MTE_NONE_ERR)
+		break;
+	case MTE_NONE_ERR:
 		en |= PR_MTE_TCF_NONE;
+		break;
+	}
 
 	en |= (incl_mask << PR_MTE_TAG_SHIFT);
 	/* Enable address tagging ABI, mte error reporting mode and tag inclusion mask. */
-- 
2.30.2