[PATCH] dt-bindings: clock: stm32mp1: adapt example for "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure"

[Alexandre TORGUE]

Hi Rob

On 5/9/22 21:16, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2022 15:46:58 +0200, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> For "st,stm32mp1-rcc-secure" schema, clocks and clock-names entries are now
>> required properties.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>>
> 
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> 
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> 
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dts:27.33-34 syntax error
> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:364: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/st,stm32mp1-rcc.example.dtb] Error 1
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [Makefile:1401: dt_binding_check] Error 2
> 
> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> 
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
> 
> This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> series is generally the most recent rc1.
> 
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
> 
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> 
> Please check and re-submit.
> 

I just updated dtschema and yamllint seems to be well installed. I don't 
see the see above. I wrote this patch on top of my stm32-next tree. Do I 
have to send it directly to arm-soc in order to be merged on top of my 
latest pull-request ?

Alex