[PATCH 3/6] dt-bindings: net: Add documentation for phy-supply

Mark Brown broonie at kernel.org
Mon May 9 09:12:33 PDT 2022


On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 06:02:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 03:26:47PM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:

> > For the difference between the 2, according to my basic read (I am bad a it) of the shematic
> > https://linux-sunxi.org/images/5/50/OrangePi_3_Schematics_v1.5.pdf
> > phy-io(ephy-vdd25) seems to (at least) power MDIO bus.

> So there is nothing in the data sheet of the RTL8211E to suggest you
> can uses these different power supplies independently. The naming
> 'phy-io-supply' is very specific to RTL8211E, but you are defining a
> generic binding here. I don't know the regulator binding, it is
> possible to make phy-supply a list?

No, that's not a thing - the supplies are individual, named properties
and even if there were a list we'd still want them to be named so it's
clear what's going on.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20220509/c215e043/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list