[PATCH 2/3] staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of global device structure
Stefan Wahren
stefan.wahren at i2se.com
Mon May 9 03:51:52 PDT 2022
Hi Adrien,
Am 05.05.22 um 20:11 schrieb Adrien Thierry:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thanks for your feedback.
>
>> i understand the motivation, but could you please explain more in detail
>> why you decided to add vchiq_instance instead of device reference? I
>> think vchiq_instance is a more internal structure which should be
>> avoided in kernel consumers like bcm2835-audio or mmal.
> I used the vchiq_instance instead of the device reference because in order
> to get rid of the vchiq_states array (patch 3/3 [1]), I needed another way
> to access the vchiq_state in the 'handle_to_service' function. So I passed
> the vchiq_instance to it (I could also have passed the state directly
> instead of the instance), and this propagated in the caller chain all the
> way up to 'vchiq_bulk_transmit' and friends which are used in the
> bcm2835-audio consumer.
Okay, in this case please add this explanation to the commit message.
Best regards
> Please let me know if you see a better way of
> doing this :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrien
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220502183045.206519-4-athierry@redhat.com/
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list