(EXT) Re: (EXT) [PATCH v2 00/12] drm: bridge: Add Samsung MIPI DSIM bridge

Alexander Stein alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com
Thu May 5 00:48:34 PDT 2022


Hello Jagan,

thanks for the quick response.

Am Donnerstag, 5. Mai 2022, 09:38:48 CEST schrieb Jagan Teki:
> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 12:57 PM Alexander Stein
> 
> <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com> wrote:
> > Hello Jagan,
> > 
> > thanks for the second version of this patchset.
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2022, 13:40:09 CEST schrieb Jagan Teki:
> > > This series supports common bridge support for Samsung MIPI DSIM
> > > which is used in Exynos and i.MX8MM SoC's.
> > > 
> > > Previous v1 can be available here [1].
> > > 
> > > The final bridge supports both the Exynos and i.MX8MM DSI devices.
> > > 
> > > On, summary this patch-set break the entire DSIM driver into
> > > - platform specific glue code for platform ops, component_ops.
> > > - common bridge driver which handle platform glue init and invoke.
> > > 
> > > Patch 0000:   Samsung DSIM bridge
> > > 
> > > Patch 0001:   Common lookup code for OF-graph or child
> > > 
> > > Patch 0002:   platform init flag via driver_data
> > > 
> > > Patch 0003/10:  bridge fixes, atomic API's
> > > 
> > > Patch 0011:   document fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim
> > > 
> > > Patch 0012:   add i.MX8MM DSIM support
> > > 
> > > Tested in Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SoM.
> > > 
> > > Anyone interested, please have a look on this repo [2]
> > > 
> > > [2] https://github.com/openedev/kernel/tree/imx8mm-dsi-v2
> > > [1]
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20220408162108.1845
> > > 83-> 1-jagan at amarulasolutions.com/
> > > 
> > > Any inputs?
> > 
> > I was able to get my LVDS display running using this driver and an LVDS
> > bridge. Actually my setup is similar to yours. My chain is like this:
> > MIPI-DSI -> sn65dsi83 -> LVDS panel
> > I noticed some things though:
> > My setup only works if I use less than 4 lanes. See [1]. When using 4
> > lanes
> > the image is flickering, but the content is "visible". Your DT has only 2
> > lanes configured, do you have the possibility to use 4 lanes? I have no
> > idea how to tackle this. It might be the DSIM side or the bridge side.
> > Apparently the downstream kernel from NXP supports 4 lanes, if I can trust
> > the config. I have no way to verify this though.
> 
> What is dsi_lvds_bridge node? have you added your dts changes on top
> of imx8mm-dsi-v2 branch I'm pointing it.

I cherry-picked your commits and applied them on (currently) next-20220504.
Maybe you missed the links at the end of my mail. The branch I am talking 
about is https://github.com/tq-steina/linux/commits/imx8mm-dsi-lvds
This includes your commits as well as my additions.

> I will check 4 lanes and let you know.

Great, thanks.

> > Another thing is I get the following warning
> > 
> > > sn65dsi83 2-002d: Unsupported LVDS bus format 0x100a, please check
> > > output
> > 
> > bridge driver. Falling back to SPWG24.
> 
> This couldn't be much affected but will fix it.
> 
> > This seems to be caused by a wrong bridge chain. Using commit 81e80429 at
> > [2]> 
> > I get the following output:
> > > bridge chain: /soc at 0/bus at 30800000/i2c at 30a40000/dsi-lvds-bridge at 2d -> /
> > 
> > panel_lvds0 -> /soc at 0/bus at 32c00000/dsi at 32e10000 ->
> > Which seems weird. I would have expected something like
> > dsi at 32e10000 -> dsi-lvds-bridge at 2d -> panel_lvds0
> > Do you happen to see somthing similar? But this is completely unrelated to
> > your patchset though.
> 
> Can you share the link to the exact commit?

This is the commit introducing this output:
https://github.com/tq-steina/linux/commit/
81e80429341cd0a4f119ec9cf50839498915443b

Best regards,
Alexander






More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list